Law Web

Pages

  • Home
  • Law Web Search Engine
  • Privacy Policy - Law Web
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use

Wednesday, 1 May 2019

Judgments on property rights of daughter after Hindu Succession amendment Act 2005

https://www.vakilno1.com/legal-news/important-judgments-on-property-rights-of-women-daughters-in-india.html
https://www.lawweb.in/search/label/S%206%20of%20hindu%20succession%20Act
Print Page
at 15:09
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: daughter, daughter's right to property, Hindu succession amendment Act 2005, S 6 of hindu succession Act, Study material

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Featured post

Whether Advocate representing party before Arbitrator can enter in to contingent contract with party for his fees?

Join Our Newsletter

* indicates required

Thoughts

thoughts

Like us On Facebook

Follow us On Twitter

Follow lawweb1 on Twitter @LawWeb1

Connect Us On LinkedIn

Poll Of The Month

Popular Posts

  • Whether CDR report is admissible in evidence in absence of certificate as per S 65B of evidence Act?
    On CDR, learned counsel for accused No.1 strenuously submitted that there is no compliance of the mandatory provisions of  Section 65B ...
  • Guidelines of Supreme court in respect of filing of vakalatnama
     We may at this juncture digress and express our concern in regard to the manner in which defective Vakalatnamas are routinely file...
  • Whether court can allow amendment of written statement on ground of negligence of Advocate?
     In the instant case, the statement that in spite of being duly instructed, the learned Advocate on record did not incorporate the plead...
  • Landmark judgment of Supreme court revolutionizing MACT Cases
    The learned counsel submitted that in respect of the legislative changes suggested in the judgment rendered in Jai Prakash v. Nation...
  • Whether civil court can issue direction for making or deleting entries in records of rights?
    It is true that the prayer made in plaint is not properly worded. Instead of seeking a declaration of his title, the respondent No. 1 had p...

Followers
Powered by Blogger.