.png)
Good morning, everyone. Today, we’ll journey together through the fascinating world of video recordings as evidence in Indian courts. By the end, you’ll understand how a simple video from a raid became the centerpiece of a Supreme Court landmark ruling in Kailash S/o Bajirao Pawar vs. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 1117).
Early one morning in Akot, Maharashtra, officers conducted a raid under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. They seized 147 kg of ganja and recorded every move with a professional videographer’s camera. That continuous footage captured suspects entering a field, officers searching rooms, and the moment contraband was placed into sealed bags.
Students, imagine watching that video and knowing it’s the exact sequence of events—no memories to fade, no confusion over who said what. But how do we ensure the court trusts this video?
2. Section 65B: Turning Video into
Legal Gold
Under the Evidence Act, electronic
records—like videos—are considered documents. However, to admit them, we rely
on Section 65B, which says:
a. Which device made the recording.
b. When and how it was recorded.
c. Any steps taken to process or transfer
the file.
Once that certificate is attached, the
video becomes a fully recognized document in court—no longer just pixels but a legal record.
3. Keeping the Video Untouched: Chain
of Custody
Before certification, the video must be
preserved carefully:
·
Seal the
original storage media (SD card or DVR) the moment it’s taken from the camera.
·
Log every
time someone handles or copies the file.
·
Store it
securely so no one can tamper with the recording.
This chain of custody record proves the
video is the same from camera to courtroom.
4. The High Court’s Roadblock:
Unnecessary Hurdles
At trial, the video—backed by its
certificate—helped secure convictions. But the Bombay High Court ordered a retrial, arguing that:
1. The video had to be played during each
witness’s testimony.
2. Each witness needed to narrate every
action they saw on camera.
3. Transcripts of the entire footage were
mandatory.
They treated the video like a book that
needed someone to read every page aloud—a requirement never intended by law.
5. The Supreme Court’s Restoration: Let
the Video Speak
The Supreme Court stepped in and
clarified:
6. Why This Matters for You
As future law graduates:
·
Remember
that Section 65B turns electronic
records into documents—focus on understanding certificate requirements.
·
Appreciate
the importance of chain of custody
for every piece of evidence.
·
Recognize
the Supreme Court’s balanced approach: videos need certification but not
endless narration.
·
Understand
that retrials are exceptional; procedural errors alone won’t automatically earn
a second trial.
By mastering these principles, you’ll
be well-equipped to analyze and argue cases involving digital evidence. The Kailash judgment ensures that when the
future calls for cameras in courtrooms, the law is ready to let video evidence
speak clearly and fairly.
