What is a Pre-nuptial Agreement?
What is a Pre-nuptial Agreement?
The Guardian and Wards 1890 is a secular act that applies to every citizen and communities of India while The Hindu Guardianship and Minorities Act of 1965 is applicable only to Hindus and subsets of Hindus such as Jains, Buddhists, Sikhs, Lingayat, Arya Samaj, Followers of Brahmo, Followers of Prarthana Samaj, and Virashiva.
Other religious communities such as Muslims, Parsis and Christians do not fall within the scope of this law. This law is added to the Law of Guardians and Wards of 1860 and does not replace the latter. GWA 1890 covers the procedure on how to petition courts for the appointment of a guardian.
Print Page
|
2. Definitions.—In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—
(a) “degree of prohibited relationship” shall have the same meaning as in the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (43 of 1954);
(b) “district”, in relation to a Marriage Officer, means the area within which the duties of his office are to be discharged;
(c) “foreign country” means a country or place outside India, and includes a ship which is for the time being in the territorial waters of such a country or place;
(d) “Marriage Officer” means a person appointed under Section 3 to be a Marriage Officer;
3. Marriage Officers.—For the purposes of this Act, the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint such of its diplomatic or consular officers as it may think fit to be Marriage Officers for any foreign country.
Explanation.—In this section, “diplomatic officer” means an ambassador, envoy, minister, high commissioner, commissioner charge-d'affaires or other diplomatic representative or a counsellor or secretary of an embassy, legation or high commission.
Section 4(1) of the Act contains the provision for maintenance to the divorced woman from her children but this does in fact not debar the divorced Muslim woman from invoking the provision of Section 125 of Cr. PC against her children. Even under the Act the application of the provisions of Section 125 of Cr. PC has been contemplated and the Act has not specifically made any ouster of the application of Section 125 Cr.PC Section 5 of the Act has imposed one condition for the application of sections 125 to 128 of Cr. P C against former husband of the divorced Muslim woman but it is conspicuously silent as regards their application against others. The framework of the Act itself and the ratio decided in the case of Danial Latifi (supra) which we have discussed above will show that the Act itself is not a substituted measure of Section 125 of Cr. P C but in addition thereto. This suggests that the proceeding under Section 125 of Cr.PC against children of the respondent mother is quite maintainable despite the pendency of the proceeding under sections 3, 4 of the Act against her husband.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
C.R.R. No. 516 of 2001
Decided On: 10.12.2001
Makiur Rahaman Kha and Ors. Vs. Mahila Bibi
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
N.C. Sil, J.
Citation: MANU/WB/0390/2001.
Print Page