Law Web: S 23 of POCSO Act

Pages

▼

Showing posts with label S 23 of POCSO Act. Show all posts

Thursday, 23 March 2017

Bombay HC: Registered Sale Deed Cannot Be Contradicted by an Unregistered Agreement; Trial Court Cannot Act as a Mere Post Office of the Prosecution

I am afraid this contention cannot be heard in law. The law of this subject is very well settled. The Apex Court in the matter of S.Saktive...
Delhi HC: Father cannot use money in daughter's PPF account to pay maintenance

While it is shown that the account had been closed and money taken out by the Appellant / Defendant in accordance with PPF Act and closure ...
Bombay High Court Drops POCSO Charge Against Youth Booked For Slapping, Abusing Minor In Filthy Language due to absence of Sexual intent

I have heard all learned counsel. Perused the impugned order.The allegations against the Applicant are that he followed the victim and abus...
Whether court can reject an application if there is non mentioning or wrong mentioning of provision in said application?

Reliance of Adv. Kaptan on Challamane Huchha Gowda v. M.R. Tirumala,(2004) 1 SCC 453, at page 459 (para 10) shows that it is a settled p...
Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Presumed Valid; Minor Discrepancy In Attestation Witness Details Won't Invalidate Execution

In our considered opinion, the aforesaid discrepancy was wholly inconsequential and incapable of dislodging the presumption attaching to a ...

Powered by Blogger.