Pages

▼
Showing posts with label S 451 of CRPC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label S 451 of CRPC. Show all posts
Sunday, 27 July 2025

Bombay HC: Under which circumstances, order of disposal of property during pendency of criminal trial will be final order or interlocutory order?

›
Three types of orders under Section 457(1) can be passed in various eventualities. Occasion to pass an order for disposal of property can ar...

Bombay HC: Order passed under sec. 451 and 457 of the Cr.P.C. being an interlocutory order in view of bar under sec. 397(2) revision against it is not maintainable

›
  Learned single Judge held that the order passed by the Magistrate was an order of interim nature subject to final order and it was interlo...
Sunday, 2 August 2020

Whether the court can release Gun Seized during the investigation on Supratnama during the pendency of proceeding?

›
Admittedly, the case has been registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 307 IPC r/w Section 25 of Arms Act, after inv...
Friday, 28 June 2019

Leading Supreme Court on release of seized property on Supratnama

›
To avoid a situation, in our view, powers under Section 451 Cr.P.C. should be exercised promptly and at the earliest. Valuable Article...

Whether vehicle seized under NDPS Act can be released on Supratnama?

›
Even otherwise in the absence of any provision, which bars from release of any vehicle seized, there appears no reason to keep the vehicle...
Saturday, 5 January 2019

Whether court should return property to person from whom it was seized without considering title of third party over said property?

›
We are unable to subscribe to the submission which has been urged on behalf of the first respondent that when it makes an order under Sec...
Friday, 25 March 2016

Whether court can permit sale of seized gold during pendency of criminal case?

›
The order of interim custody shall, however, depend on the nature of the property and the circumstances of the case. Where the Magistra...
Monday, 30 March 2015

Procedure to be followed by magistrate for releasing cattle on supratnama who are taken for slaughtering

›
 In Krushi Goseva Sangh's case (supra), this Court has observed that section 6 of the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act imposes re...
Wednesday, 15 May 2013

Whether magistrate should pass order pertaining to custody of property while considering C Summary Report?

›
 In view of distinction as above, it is difficult to swallow the contention of Advocate Shri Bilolikar that earlier order dated 14.2.2002 ...
Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Madhya Pradesh HC: Magistrate has no jurisdiction to release vehicle on supratnama which is seized for default of payment of motor vehicle tax

›
Jurisdiction cannot be assumed where none existed. No one then can say that it is there. Intention of statute is to secure payment of tax....