Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
Law Web Search Engine
Privacy Policy - Law Web
Disclaimer
Terms of Use
▼
Showing posts with label
S 457 of CRPC
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
S 457 of CRPC
.
Show all posts
Sunday, 27 July 2025
Bombay HC: Under which circumstances, order of disposal of property during pendency of criminal trial will be final order or interlocutory order?
›
Three types of orders under Section 457(1) can be passed in various eventualities. Occasion to pass an order for disposal of property can ar...
Bombay HC: Order passed under sec. 451 and 457 of the Cr.P.C. being an interlocutory order in view of bar under sec. 397(2) revision against it is not maintainable
›
Learned single Judge held that the order passed by the Magistrate was an order of interim nature subject to final order and it was interlo...
Tuesday, 7 March 2023
Under which circumstances Magistrate who has no jurisdiction to try the case can release seized property U/S 457 of CRPC?
›
On a reading of Section 457 Cr.P.C, we find that the said provision coverers a wide spectrum and would apply to all kinds of seizures un...
Can the court release seized property at the investigation stage U/S 457 of CRPC even if not produced before the court?
›
The fact that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has given a direction to the learned Criminal Court to consider release of seized property/articl...
Friday, 10 September 2021
What conditions magistrate can impose for the release of a vehicle on supratnama seized for carrying sand?
›
The learned counsel for the petitioner also relied on the ratio laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 7873 of 2...
Sunday, 3 March 2013
Whether Magistrate can release of vehicle on supratnama seized U/S 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act?
›
The Counsel for the petitioner, however, relied on the decision of the single Judge of the Allahabad High Court in the case of Ram Se...
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
Madhya Pradesh HC: Magistrate has no jurisdiction to release vehicle on supratnama which is seized for default of payment of motor vehicle tax
›
Jurisdiction cannot be assumed where none existed. No one then can say that it is there. Intention of statute is to secure payment of tax....
›
Home
View web version