Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
Law Web Search Engine
Privacy Policy - Law Web
Disclaimer
Terms of Use
▼
Showing posts with label
S 55(2) of Maharashtra rent control Act
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
S 55(2) of Maharashtra rent control Act
.
Show all posts
Sunday, 7 July 2019
Whether unregistered leave and licence agreement is admissible in evidence?
›
The contention of the learned Advocate for the petitioner that the absence of registered written agreement would render of license to be i...
Sunday, 9 December 2018
Whether civil suit will be barred if tenancy agreement is not registered?
›
This Court, in the matter of Raj Prasanna Kondur v. Arif Taher Khan and Ors., reported in MANU/MH/1264/2004 : 2005 (4) Bom.C.R. 383, has ...
Whether lease agreement will become void if it is not registered?
›
The learned Counsel then submits that the agreement is required to be compulsorily registered by virtue of provisions of Section 55 of th...
Whether incorrect interpretation of leave and licence agreement is binding on licensor?
›
Mr. Seervai then relied upon Section 55 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, which reads as under: 55. Tenancy agreement to be c...
Whether agreement will come into existence even if it is to be performed at future date?
›
Mr. Seervai contended that the said leave and licence agreements had not come into effect/existence. He based the submission on the fact t...
Wednesday, 15 August 2018
When prosecution for violation of S 55 of Maharashtra rent control Act is liable to be quashed?
›
We have perused the impugned order passed by the Magistrate. While passing the order dated 6th August, 2015, the Magistrate has not reco...
Tuesday, 23 September 2014
Whether obligation to get tenancy agreement is continuous in nature?
›
I quite see that, issue of limitation is a mixed question of fact and law and the adjudication necessarily can only be done by the fact ...
Sunday, 16 December 2012
Whether requirement of registration of tenancy agreement is retrospective in nature?
›
Mr. Apte, the learned counsel for the petitioner, firstly submits that the agreements of leave and licence dated 1st May, 1996 and 1st ...
›
Home
View web version