Pages

▼
Showing posts with label S 90 of Evidence Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label S 90 of Evidence Act. Show all posts
Sunday, 12 April 2026

Supreme Court: Presumption regarding documents 30 years old as per S 90 of evidence Act does not apply to a will

›
 This Court, in M.B. Ramesh (D) by L.Rs. v. K.M. Veeraje Urs (D) by L. Rs. and Ors.,8 while dealing with a similar argument regarding applic...
Sunday, 9 August 2020

Supreme Court: Presumption U/S 90 of Evidence Act is not applicable for proof of will

›
  At the same time we cannot accept the submission on behalf of the Respondents as well that merely because the will was more than 30 year...
Sunday, 29 December 2019

Chhatis HC: Presumption U/S 90 of evidence Act can be raised in respect of executed documents only

›
It would thus be seen that the plaintiffs' case rests only on the certified copy of the sale deed which do not contain the signature...
Sunday, 29 September 2019

Whether presumption U/S 90 of Evidence Act is applicable to document like will?

›
On the point no. 3, regarding status of the suit property, as to whether it is trust property or not, arguments were vehemently submitted ...
Sunday, 6 January 2019

What are necessary conditions for drawing presumption U/S 90 of Evidence Act?

›
 This Court in Paramesh Sarmah & Ors. Vs. Islamali & Ors. (supra), held in para-9 as under: " 9. The condition on which t...
Tuesday, 10 July 2018

Whether it is necessary to prove contents of documents 30 years old?

›
Presumption under Section 90 of the Evidence Act in respect of 30 years' old document coming from proper custody relates to the signatu...
1 comment:
Thursday, 11 May 2017

Whether partition of joint family property can be proved by document thirty years old?

›
 Defendant No. 1 came with specific case that plaintiff and Nandlal had separated from each other from prior to year 1944. He contende...

Whether it is mandatory for court to draw presumption U/S 90 of Evidence Act?

›
The learned counsel for appellants tried to use section 90 of the Evidence Act in support of his submissions. Section 90 of the Evidence...
Sunday, 6 March 2016

When will which is thirty years old shall be deemed to proved even though no attesting witness is examined?

›
As noticed by the appellate Court it is no doubt true under  Section 68  of the Evidence Act all documents compulsorily attestable shoul...

What is presumption in respect of will which is thirty years old as per S 90 of Evidence Act?

›
The counsel for the appellant relying on the decision reported in Munnalal v. Kashibai ( AIR 1947 PC 15 ) contended that the presumption...
Wednesday, 13 May 2015

When court should not permit to draw presumption that document is thirty years old?

›
 The Appellant has, in his effort to succeed before us, variously and discrepantly theorised the thirty-year statutory requirement. As one ...