Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
Law Web Search Engine
Privacy Policy - Law Web
Disclaimer
Terms of Use
▼
Showing posts with label
S 91 of evidence Act
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
S 91 of evidence Act
.
Show all posts
Friday, 2 April 2021
Whether the daughter can get a partition of ancestral property by disowning relinquishment deed?
›
The plaintiffs, while admitting the execution of sale deed Ex.A-2, refute the release deed. The recital in the release deed refers the exec...
Sunday, 6 January 2019
Whether it is necessary to adduce oral evidence to prove terms of lease deed?
›
Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act deals with evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reduced to the ...
Sunday, 16 April 2017
Whether defendant can adduce evidence contrary to contents of agreement of sale?
›
In so far as the submission of the learned counsel for the plaintiff that the defendant no.1 could not have been permitted to lead evide...
Monday, 13 March 2017
Whether the court can permit defendant to plead contrary to registered Sale deed ?
›
Order 7 Rule 11, Order 12 Rule 6 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 91, 92 - Possession - Sale deed - Title - Rejection of counter-claim - Decr...
1 comment:
Monday, 23 May 2016
Whether oral evidence in respect of Auction sale is admissible?
›
Mr. Almeida, learned Counsel for the defendants, contended that in terms of Section 91 of the Evidence Act, oral evidence with respect ...
Friday, 26 June 2015
Whether court can supply a word while interpreting a deed which is not used by author of document?
›
In the case of “Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.”(supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that a document, as is well known, must ...
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
The Word "Terms" as used in section 91 and 92 of evidence act
›
The expression "terms" in sec 91 and 92 of evidence act must relate to statements assertions or representations contained in wr...
Friday, 23 March 2012
Whether Sale deed signed by only vendor is valid?
›
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Sections 91 and 92 – It is not open to a party to a document to prove by oral evidence a variation in the...
›
Home
View web version