Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
Law Web Search Engine
Privacy Policy - Law Web
Disclaimer
Terms of Use
▼
Showing posts with label
email
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
email
.
Show all posts
Friday, 23 August 2024
Bombay HC: Objectionable Words Written In E-Mail Or On Social Media Can Be Penalized U/S 509 of IPC For Insulting Woman's Modesty
›
Later, legislature found that a woman must be protected not only from physical aggressions made in the course of outraging her modesty, but...
Sunday, 29 October 2023
Whether service of scanned copy of arbitral award by email is valid service of signed copy of award so as to start limitation for filing an application U/S 34 of Arbitration Act?
›
When scanned signed copy of order dated 07th March, 2018 was received by petitioner by email dated 22nd May, 2018 and scanned signed copy of...
Saturday, 28 October 2023
Whether the court can infer that there was contract on the basis of exchange of Emails?
›
I agree with the Plaintiff's Counsel submission relying on the case of Jyotsna Valia (supra) that a written contract need not always be...
Friday, 14 April 2023
Whether there is a valid service of notice under Income tax Act if notice is sent on secondary Email ID?
›
In the present case on 7th January 2021 the petitioner had filed its Return of Income for AY 2020 -21 and the email id mentioned therein w...
Tuesday, 14 March 2023
Questions and answers on law Part 55
›
Q 1:- Whether Judgment passed by supreme court can be challenged before civil court? If it can be challenged under which provision? Ans: As ...
Sunday, 14 March 2021
Karnataka HC Guidelines to police for Search Of Smartphones, Laptops, Electronic Gadgets, Email Accounts of accused
›
17.4. Pending such formulation, it would be required that the following minimum guidelines are implemented: 17.5. In the case of a personal...
What are the powers of the court or police about the search and seizure of a smartphone, computer, server or any other electronic item or equipment?
›
9. ANSWER POINT No.1: Can a direction be issued to an accused to furnish the password, passcode or Biometrics in order to open the smart...
1 comment:
Whether court directing accused to give password of his social media account will violate his right to privacy?
›
15. ANSWER TO QUESTION NO.8:Would providing of password, passcode or Biometrics violate the right to privacy of a person providing the sa...
Whether court directing accused to give password of his social media account amounts self-incrimination or testimonial compulsion?
›
14. ANSWER TO POINT NO.7:Would providing a password, passcode or Biometrics amount to self-incrimination or testimonial compulsion? 14.1...
When the court can permit the investigating officer to hack into the smartphone and/or email account of the accused?
›
ANSWER TO POINT NO.9:What steps could be taken if the accused or any other person connected with the investigation were to refuse to furni...
What is the duty of investigating officer if he comes across confidential information of the accused during the course of the investigation?
›
ANSWER TO QUESTION NO.8:Would providing of password, passcode or Biometrics violate the right to privacy of a person providing the said pa...
Tuesday, 14 July 2020
Supreme Court: Service of Summons may be effected by e-mail, FAX, instant messaging services, such as WhatsApp, Telegram, etc
›
I.A. No. 48461/2020- Service of all notices, summons and exchange of pleadings Service of notices, summons and exchange of plea...
Saturday, 16 May 2020
Whether court can permit production of certificate U/S 65B of Evidence Act at subsequent stage?
›
Anwar P.V. (supra) partly overruled the earlier decision of the Supreme Court on the procedure to prove electronic record(s) in Navjot San...
Friday, 15 May 2020
How to prove Email sent by accused in Criminal prosecution?
›
Electronic Mails 62. We will now turn to the electronic mails which the prosecution has relied on. It has sought to prove this evid...
What are material prerequisites for proof of email evidence?
›
What falls for adjudication in the present case is whether on the basis of the aforesaid emails, the defendant No. 1 can be said to be h...
›
Home
View web version