Pages

▼
Showing posts with label identification of accused. Show all posts
Showing posts with label identification of accused. Show all posts
Wednesday, 29 January 2025

Supreme Court: Victim identifying unknown accused Without Test Identification For First Time During Trial After Many Years Raises Doubts

›
 Furthermore, no identification parade has been conducted in the present matter. While identification by a witness in a given case for the f...
Friday, 6 October 2023

Under which circumstances the court can held that victim was minor even though no ossification test was conducted?

›
  There was no ossification test conducted in this case, however, this question would come when the girl is on the border line. When there i...

Whether the court can rely on identification of accused by victim even if she has not stated name of accused in her statement U/S 164 of CRPC?

›
The identification of the accused is the important point raised on behalf of the accused, however, only a stray suggestion or question was a...
Friday, 7 August 2020

Whether court can convict accused with the aid of S 34 of IPC in place of S 149 of IPC even though no charge was framed U/S 34 of IPC?

›
Effect of Failure to frame proper charges 39. In State of Andhra Pradesh v. Thakkidiram Reddy and Ors. MANU/SC/0490/1998 : (1998) 6 S...
Sunday, 26 March 2017

Whether test identification parade will be vitiated if two accused are identified in same TIP?

›
The next question is whether the Test Identification Parades were vitiated on account of delay or for holding those TIPs jointly, or on a...

What will be importance of test identification parade if accused is already known to witness?

›
 The purpose of a TIP is to ensure that the investigation is going on the right track and it is merely a corroborative evidence. The act...
Saturday, 30 April 2016

When court can rely on identification of accused before court first time if test identification parade was not previously held?

›
 No doubt, law with regard to the importance of TIP is well settled that identification in court is a substantive piece of evidence and TI...
Saturday, 26 March 2016

Whether involvement of accused in crime can be ruled out because test identification parade was not held in accordance with law?

›
Be that as it may, the identification of an accused in a T.I. parade is merely a corroborative piece of evidence and the involvement of t...
Sunday, 2 June 2013

Leading Supreme court judgment on test identification

›
Facts which establish the identity of an accused person are relevant under s. 9 of the Evidence Act. The substantive evidence of identi...
Saturday, 29 December 2012

Whether Identification of accused by witnesses by photograph is permissible?

›
The learned Counsel for the appellant vehemently contended that showing of photographs to the witnesses for the purpose of identificatio...