Here, the alienation is not done by a coparcener, but the same is done by an outsider i.e. Khot family. Therefore, the issue of alienation b...

It cannot be disputed that the properties divided among Defendant No. 1 and his brothers through partition deed dated 09.05.1986, are joint ...

In the complex realm of joint family property, the legal nuances surrounding the sale of such assets, particularly when minors are involved,...

  The suit property which is undivided is left with the co-owners to proceed in accordance with law to get their shares determined and demar...

Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act (1956), Ss.6,8,12 - Minor's undivided interest in joint family property - Sale of minor's share ...

 The evidence on record shows that the joint family property was purported to be exclusively usurped by the brothers to exclude the sisters....

The evidence on record shows that the joint family property was purported to be exclusively usurped by the brothers to exclude the sisters. ...

  Such being the case, I am of the considered opinion that a beneficiary of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act cannot claim a benefit by ...

  It is an admitted fact that, plaintiff No.1 is the legally wedded wife of defendant No.1 and out of the said wedlock, plaintiff No.2 is bo...

   Once the factum of existence of legal necessity stood proved, then, in our view, no co-coparcener (son) has a right to challenge the sale...

The question is to whether clause (5) in question is vague and unenforceable. We noticed that it provides that the property in question cann...

   To establish a fiduciary relationship of the mother (D1) with her children, the appellant has once again used the same facts and chain of...

Reverting to the facts of the present case, admittedly, the defendants-respondents were nephews, i.e., brother’s sons of Smt. Jagno. We need...

  The law is well settled that the burden is on the person who alleges that the property is a joint property of an HUF to prove the same. Re...

Furthermore, it is essential to observe that the present appellant's claim also does not fall within the exception (iii) to Section 2(...

  In the present case, the first defendant has squarely questioned the title, of the plaintiff, to the suit property, and has contended...

Earlier, an oral partition was permissible, and at the same time, the burden of proof remained on the person who asserted that there  ...

In Ramaswami Nayakar v. Raja Padayachi MANU/TN/0247/1925 : AIR1926Mad963 , it has been held that the question whether the self-acquired p...

Sri R. Gopalaswami Iyengar, appearing for the contesting respondents 1 and 2 urged that as there was no joint family property, there coul...

Prior to enactment of Hindu Succession Act 1956,on the death of one coparcener of joint family,other coparceners of joint family were gett...