Pages

▼
Showing posts with label perversity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label perversity. Show all posts
Sunday, 3 August 2025

What legal principles the session judge should follow while deciding criminal appeal?

›
Introduction The appellate process in criminal cases is a vital mechanism to ensure justice, safeguard rights, and maintain legal integrity...
Monday, 30 May 2016

Basic principles for grant of temporary injunction

›
This Court in Wander Ltd. (supra), while dealing with appeals against orders granting or refusing a prayer for interlocutory injunction, ...
Saturday, 14 May 2016

Whether plaintiff can prove a fact even though he has not examined himself?

›
 In the case before us, there is clear and cogent evidence on the side of the plaintiff/appellant that there has been structural alt...

When first appellate court is last court of facts?

›
 ‘Perversity’ has been the subject matter of umpteen number of decisions of this Court. It has also been settled by several decisions of...

When supreme court entertain appeals against interlocutory orders?

›
 This Court does not normally entertain appeals against interlocutory orders. In the case of trademarks, however, keeping in perspective ...
Friday, 25 March 2016

Whether revisional court can set aside order of Magistrate if his order is not perverse?

›
Unless the order passed by the Magistrate is perverse or the view taken by the court is wholly unreasonable or there is non- consideration ...
Sunday, 21 February 2016

When appreciation of evidence will be perverse?

›
Safest approach on perversity is the classic approach on the reasonable man’s inference on the facts. To him, if the conclusion on the ...

Whether wrong finding of fact will constitute question of law?

›
Be that as it may, the question whether there is a structural alteration in a tenanted premises is not a fact limited to the personal kno...