Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
Law Web Search Engine
Privacy Policy - Law Web
Disclaimer
Terms of Use
▼
Showing posts with label
relationship in the nature of marriage
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
relationship in the nature of marriage
.
Show all posts
Sunday, 31 December 2023
Important Supreme Court and Bombay HC Judgments on 'relationship in the nature of marriage' provided under Domestic violence Act
›
1) Whether is distinction between a 'relationship in the nature of marriage' provided under Domestic violence Act and live- in rel...
Tuesday, 19 December 2023
What is Alienation of affection under matrimonial law and whether it is a tort?
›
ALIENATION OF AFFECTION 64. Appellant had entered into this relationship knowing well that the Respondent was a married person and encourage...
Supreme Court Guidelines to ascertain when a live-in relationship will fall within "relationship in the nature of marriage" as per provisions of Domestic violence Act
›
We may, on the basis of above discussion cull out some guidelines for testing under what circumstances, a live-in relationship will fall wit...
Whether is distinction between a 'relationship in the nature of marriage' provided under Domestic violence Act and live- in relationship?
›
Some countries in the world recognize common law marriages. A common law marriage, sometimes called de facto marriage, or informal marriage...
Saturday, 13 July 2019
Supreme Court guidelines for testing when live in relationship is in nature of marriage
›
We may, on the basis of above discussion cull out some guidelines for testing under what circumstances, a live-in relationship will fall w...
Sunday, 1 December 2013
Whether Live in relationship with married person amounts to relationship in the nature of marriage as per provisions of DV Act?
›
Supreme Court: Dealing with a pivotal question that whether a ‘live-in-relationship’ would amount to ‘relationship in the nature of marri...
Friday, 29 November 2013
Supreme court: All live-in- relationships are not relationships in the nature of marriage
›
We are, therefore, of the view that the appellant, having been fully aware of the fact that the respondent was a married person, could n...
›
Home
View web version