However, in so far as the second requirement insisted by the respondent no. 1 to produce the consent from the father of the petitioner n...

Petitioner no. 3 is adjudged as mentally challenged and, in view of section 9(1-C) there is prohibition for removal of organs or tissu...

We have considered the matter and in our view, the submission is correct, but not only so. The reference to the Rules would show that it...

  Dismissing the petition filed by “Fortis Hospitals Ltd.”, a global brand in health care services, who was aggrieved by the decision ...