Law Web: vigilance cell of high court

Pages

▼

Showing posts with label vigilance cell of high court. Show all posts

Saturday, 12 March 2016

Supreme Court: The multiplier method as laid down under Motor Vehicle Act cannot be applied to determine compensation in cases of electrocution

On the question of yardstick of compensation, we find this Court to have observed in a two-Judge Bench decision in Raman v. Uttar Haryana Bi...
Bombay HC: Registered Sale Deed Cannot Be Contradicted by an Unregistered Agreement; Trial Court Cannot Act as a Mere Post Office of the Prosecution

I am afraid this contention cannot be heard in law. The law of this subject is very well settled. The Apex Court in the matter of S.Saktive...
Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Presumed Valid; Minor Discrepancy In Attestation Witness Details Won't Invalidate Execution

In our considered opinion, the aforesaid discrepancy was wholly inconsequential and incapable of dislodging the presumption attaching to a ...
ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE & CHAIN OF CUSTODY : Why Your Court’s Computer Room Must Never Touch Electronic Evidence?

A Judicial Guide to Protecting Digital Evidence in the Age of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 OPENING: THE OPERATIONAL TRAP MOST COUR...
How to calculate compensation under land acquisition Act 2013?

Submitted by: A. Mohammed Ibrahim. B.Arch, FIV, FIE (I) FICA Valuation for Land Acquisition RFCT LARR ACT 2013 is restored. (Remo...

Powered by Blogger.