legal effect of recital in any deed

• “Contract language is ambiguous if it is ‘reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation.’”
• “Recitals are not a part of the contract and are not legally binding.”
• Although recitals standing alone are not legally binding, they may be used “to resolve ambiguity in the operative provisions of the contract because they indicate the parties’ intent.”
• Recitals in a contract cannot create conditions precedent in  a contract. “Because conditions precedent are binding obligations, it logically follows that they cannot be created in recital language.”