Contradictions - When a witness is subjected to lengthy arduous cross
examination over a lengthy period of time there is always a possibility of the
witnesses committing mistakes which can be termed a as omissions, improvements
and contradictions therefore those infirmities will have to be appreciated in
the back ground of ground realities which makes the witness confused because of
the filibustering tactics of the cross examining Counsel. (Jai Sree Yadav Vs
State of U.P.) 2004(4) Criminal Court Cases 28 (S.C.) Appeal (Crl ) No 1072/
2003, dated 12-8-2004
No comments:
Post a Comment