Mohit v. State of U.P., (2013) 7 SCC 789 (Criminal Appeal No. 814 of
2013, decided on July 1, 2013) - Any order which substantially affects
rights of accused or decides certain rights of parties is not an
interlocutory order. As the order of Trial court rejecting complainant’s
application under S. 319 for second time holding that there was
insufficient evidence against appellants to proceed against them by
issuing summons, was deciding rights and liabilities of appellants in
respect of their involvement in case, is not an “interlocutory order”
within the meaning of S. 397(2), so as to bar revision to High Court.
Print Page
No comments:
Post a Comment