The coordination and accountability of juvenile justice institutions in India are primarily governed by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and involve a structured system of multiple bodies and committees at central, state, and district levels. These institutions work collaboratively to ensure the protection, rehabilitation, and social reintegration of juveniles in conflict with the law while maintaining accountability.
Coordination of Juvenile Justice Institutions
-
The system includes Juvenile Justice Boards (JJBs), Child Welfare Committees (CWCs), Child Care Institutions (CCIs), District Child Protection Units (DCPUs), and Special Juvenile Police Units (SJPUs).
-
State governments are mandated to establish these bodies to work in coordination, ensuring comprehensive child protection and justice services.
-
Juvenile Justice Boards consist of a magistrate and two social workers focusing on the child's legal and psycho-social needs.
-
The District Magistrate is responsible for reviewing the functioning of Child Protection Committees and juvenile justice institutions regularly and reporting to the state government.
-
The state government must register and monitor all institutions, government or NGO-run, that accommodate juveniles.
Accountability Mechanisms
-
Regular reporting and reviews are mandated by law, including quarterly reports by district magistrates to district judges on juvenile justice cases.
-
The State Government can form high-level committees to review pending cases and oversee implementation.
-
The Juvenile Justice Act prescribes penalties for non-registration or non-compliance by institutions.
-
Juvenile Justice Committees established by High Courts and monitoring bodies play an enhanced role in overseeing implementation and addressing systemic issues.
-
Legal provisions ensure procedural fairness, including the assessment of juveniles' capacity to understand crimes, especially in serious offenses.
Challenges and Recommendations
-
Despite the legal framework, challenges remain in coordination due to insufficient infrastructure, underqualified staff, and differing social attitudes.
-
Effective coordination requires capacity building through training of Juvenile Justice Board members, police, and social workers.
-
There is a need for data-driven monitoring and better accountability frameworks to improve outcomes for juvenile offenders.
-
Courts have a critical role in facilitating law implementation and ensuring child-friendly trials and rehabilitation measures.
In summary, India's juvenile justice institutions operate through a multi-tiered, coordinated system designed to balance child protection, rehabilitation, and accountability, with ongoing efforts to strengthen institutional accountability and inter-agency collaboration for improved juvenile justice outcomes.
No comments:
Post a Comment