This video is produced and presented for educational and informational purposes only. The content is based on the Supreme Court of India judgment,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Suo Motu Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 2 of 2025, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 632 of 2025 and Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9334 of 2025
In Re: Summoning Advocates Who Give Legal Opinion or Represent Parties During Investigation of Cases and Related Issues.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
B.R. Gavai, C.J.I., K. Vinod Chandran and N.V. Anjaria, JJ.
Author: K. Vinod Chandran, J.
Decided On: 31.10.2025
Citation: 2025 INSC 1275, MANU/SC/1470/2025.
https://www.lawweb.in/2025/11/guardians-of-confidentiality-how-indias.html
The judgment discussed pertains to the
client's legal privilege under Sections 132 to 134 of the Bharatiya Sakshya
Adhiniyam (BSA) and related Supreme Court directions as cited in the source.
This content is aimed at legal professionals, students, and scholars seeking
insight into client-advocate confidentiality in Indian law.
The video and accompanying materials do
not constitute legal advice or opinion and should not be relied upon as a
substitute for professional legal counsel. While efforts have been made to
ensure accuracy, the creators and host disclaim any liability for errors or
omissions.
Viewers are encouraged to refer to the
original Supreme Court judgment and consult qualified legal experts for
specific cases or issues. Use of this video is at the viewer's discretion, and
the creators assume no responsibility for outcomes based on this information.
No comments:
Post a Comment