Tuesday, 16 December 2025

Comprehensive LLM Revision Guide on Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice System in India

 This one-page checklist consolidates the key themes, sections, and case laws from your notes for rapid revision before the exam.

I. CORE CONCEPTS & DEFINITIONS (The "Who")

·       Child (JJ Act 2015): Person who has not completed 18 years of age.

·       The Big Distinction:

o   CCL (Child in Conflict with Law): Alleged to have committed an offence. Authority: Juvenile Justice Board (JJB).

o   CNCP (Child in Need of Care & Protection): Victim, abandoned, or neglected. Authority: Child Welfare Committee (CWC).

·       Offence Categories (for CCL):

o   Petty: Max punishment < 3 years.

o   Serious: Punishment 3–7 years.

o   Heinous: Punishment > 7 years. Critical Exception: Children aged 16–18 accused of heinous offences can be tried as adults after a Preliminary Assessment by JJB.

·       IPC Immunity:

o   Sec 82: Absolute immunity (Doli Incapax) for child < 7 years.

o   Sec 83: Qualified immunity for child 7–12 years (must lack maturity).

II. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK (The "Why")

·       Differential Association (Sutherland): Crime is learned behavior through interaction in intimate groups (family/peers).

o   Indian Context: Peer pressure in slums, street children gangs, lack of role models.

·       Anomie/Strain Theory (Merton): Disconnect between cultural goals (wealth/success) and legitimate means (education/jobs) causes strain.

o   Modes of Adaptation: Innovation (crime), Retreatism (drugs), Rebellion (gangs).

·       Subculture Theory: Gangs provide alternative status/identity for marginalized youth.

III. LEGAL ARSENAL (The "Law")

·       Constitution:

o   Art 15(3): State can make special provisions for children.

o   Art 21A: Right to Free & Compulsory Education (6-14 yrs).

o   Art 24: Prohibition of child labor in hazardous factories/mines.

o   Art 39(e) & (f): Protect tender age from abuse; opportunities for healthy development.

o   Art 14: Reasonable classification (Age is a valid "intelligible differentia").

·       Key Statutes: JJ Act 2015 (Primary), POCSO 2012, Child Labour (Prohibition) Act, RTE Act 2009.

·       International: UNCRC (Best Interest Principle), Beijing Rules (Standard Min. Rules), Riyadh Guidelines (Prevention).

IV. INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM (The "How")

·       Juvenile Justice Board (JJB): Principal Magistrate (1st Class) + 2 Social Workers.

o   Function: Inquiry (not trial), Bail is the rule (detention only if release causes danger/association with criminals), Max stay 3 years.

·       Child Welfare Committee (CWC): Chairperson + 4 Members.

o   Function: Restoration, Foster Care, Adoption, Institutional Care.

·       Police: SJPU (Special Juvenile Police Unit) required in every district; designated Child Welfare Police Officer (CWPO) in every station.

·       Institutions:

o   Observation Home: Temporary for CCL during inquiry.

o   Special Home: For convicted CCL (rehabilitation).

o   Place of Safety: For 16-18 yr olds in heinous crimes or high-risk cases.

o   Children’s Home: For CNCP.

V. CRITICAL ISSUES (Essay Topics)

·       Causes: Poverty, Broken Homes, Urbanization, Drug Addiction (Gateway to crime), Sex Ratio Imbalance.

·       Rehabilitation vs. Reality:

o   Ideal: Individual Care Plans, Aftercare (till 21), Vocational Training.

o   Reality: Poor infrastructure, lack of trained staff, custodial torture/abuse.

·       Prevention: Role of Education (Protective factor), Family Counseling, Community Policing.

·       Child Labor: Vicious cycle (Poverty → Child Labor → Lack of Education → Delinquency).

VI. LANDMARK JUDGMENTS (The "Authorities")

·       Sheela Barse v. Union of India (1986): Fundamental directive—No child in jail. Separation of neglected vs. delinquent children.

·       Sampurna Behura v. Union of India (2018): SC monitored implementation of JJ Act; ordered setting up of JJBs/CWCs in all districts; emphasized training.

·       Pratap Singh v. State of Jharkhand (2005): Age of juvenility is determined as on the date of offence, not date of trial.

·       Subramanian Swamy v. Raju (2014): Upheld constitutionality of JJ Act 2000 (pre-2015 amendment regarding 16-18 age group).


Print Page

No comments:

Post a Comment