From the aforesaid, it is clear that when the complainant deposed in the present proceedings, he did not refer to an initial demand of ` 200/- being made by A1 on 07.02.1996. He further does not state that by way of final settlement an amount of ` 120/- was agreed to be paid. The version of the complainant as recorded in this case, therefore, is in variance with his deposition in Criminal Case No. 826/1996 on the amount of demand by A1. Be it noted that the complaint leading to Criminal Case No. 826/1996 was made on 06.03.1996, which is within a month of the alleged demand.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal Nos. 1177 of 2015 and 1183 of 2015
Decided On: 19.08.2026
Rafikmiya Ahmedmiya Malek Vs. State of Gujarat
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Ujjal Bhuyan and A.S. Chandurkar, JJ.
Author: A.S. Chandurkar, J.
Citation: 2026 INSC 890,MANU/SC/0917/2026.
Read full judgment here: Click here.
Print Page
No comments:
Post a Comment