From such an aspect, this Court is of the view that
the actor of the film, whether he has done the lead role or
not, cannot be brought within the purview of the term
`whoever causes to exhibit any cinema' under Section 55 I
(2) of the Abkari Act. Matters being so, the prosecution
proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.1869 of 2014
of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-III,
Thiruvananthapuram, based on Annexure-A Final Report,
are liable to be quashed.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016
Crl.MC.No. 7342 of 2015
PRITHVIRAJ
S/O. SUKUMARAN, CHANDRAKAMAL,
Vs
STATE OF KERALA
Print Page
the actor of the film, whether he has done the lead role or
not, cannot be brought within the purview of the term
`whoever causes to exhibit any cinema' under Section 55 I
(2) of the Abkari Act. Matters being so, the prosecution
proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.1869 of 2014
of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-III,
Thiruvananthapuram, based on Annexure-A Final Report,
are liable to be quashed.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016
Crl.MC.No. 7342 of 2015
PRITHVIRAJ
S/O. SUKUMARAN, CHANDRAKAMAL,
Vs
STATE OF KERALA