These principles of law would apply to a case wherein the description of the suit property is vague or the suit property is unidentifiable and the mistake has been corrected by the executing court or the clarification has been given by the executing court which amounts to going behind the decree. Similarly, these principles of law would not apply where description of the suit property is clear and the property is identifiable. Between these two categories of cases, there could be an intermediate category where there is some doubt about description of the property. In such intermediate category of cases, the executing court can make efforts to remove the doubt by examining the pleadings of the parties and the findings recorded by the court passing the decree. Some time in such cases, there arises a conflict between the area and boundaries of the suit property. In case of such a conflict, the law is that statement as to boundaries shall prevail.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (NAGPUR BENCH)
Writ Petition No. 1209 of 2018
Decided On: 05.12.2018
Shaikh Jalil Vs. Mohamed Rizwanul Haq and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
S.B. Shukre, J.
Citation: 2019(4) MHLJ 348
Citation: 2019(4) MHLJ 348