Thus, for instance, orders summoning witnesses adjourning cases, passing orders for bail, calling for reports and such other steps in aid of the pending proceeding, may no doubt amount to interlocutory orders against which no revision would lie under Section 397(2) of the 1973 Code. But orders which are matters of moment and which affect or adjudicate the rights of the accused or a particular aspect of the trial cannot be said to be interlocutory order so as to be outside the purview of the re-visional jurisdiction of the High Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal No. 124 of 1977
Decided On: 29.07.1977
Amar Nath and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
N.L. Untwalia and S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, JJ.
Author: S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.
Citation: AIR 1977 SC 2185,MANU/SC/0068/1977.
Print Page