In the result, we uphold the constitutional validity of the
provisions of Section 2(4) defining “establishment”, which takes
within its sweep the establishment of medical practitioner as
defined, having ten or more employees for applicability of the
establishment or class of establishments to which the provisions of
the new Act would be applicable by issuing notifiction in the
Official Gazette; and Sections 6 and 7 therein to the extent they
require registration of establishment where the strength of
employees engaged is ten or more, and provide an intimation of
the establishment to the Facilitator where the strength of
employees engged is less than ten.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.7590 of 2017
Dr. Pradeep Arora, V The State of Maharashtra,
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 2-11-2018
Print Page
provisions of Section 2(4) defining “establishment”, which takes
within its sweep the establishment of medical practitioner as
defined, having ten or more employees for applicability of the
Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, 2017, Section 4therein, which empowers the State Government to declare any
establishment or class of establishments to which the provisions of
the new Act would be applicable by issuing notifiction in the
Official Gazette; and Sections 6 and 7 therein to the extent they
require registration of establishment where the strength of
employees engaged is ten or more, and provide an intimation of
the establishment to the Facilitator where the strength of
employees engged is less than ten.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.7590 of 2017
Dr. Pradeep Arora, V The State of Maharashtra,
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 2-11-2018
