Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
Law Web Search Engine
Privacy Policy - Law Web
Disclaimer
Terms of Use
▼
Showing posts with label
govt servant
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
govt servant
.
Show all posts
Sunday, 21 August 2016
Sanction for prosecution of govt servant is required from which authority if he was holding plurality of offices?
›
Now if the public servant holds two offices and he is accused of having abused one and from which he is removed but continues to hold th...
Tuesday, 5 July 2016
Supreme court: Government official’s illegal assets can not be attached if he’s dead
›
NEW DELHI: Disproportionate assets amassed by a government official cannot be attached from his family members if the officer dies during...
Sunday, 12 June 2016
Whether govt servant can be held guilty under prevention of corruption Act if there is procedural lapse in his part?
›
Section 13(1)(d) of the PC Act reads as under: “13. Criminal misconduct by a public servant (1) A public servant is said to commit the...
Thursday, 21 April 2016
Whether govt servant who have no willingness to work can be retained in service?
›
Further, no compassion can be shown to a person who has no will to work and no respect for the directions/ warnings issued by authoritie...
Tuesday, 5 April 2016
Whether govt servants are entitled to get house rent allowance even though they are not staying at headquarter/place of duty?
›
In that view of the matter, we hold and declare that, as long as, the said Government Resolution is intact and the conditions to stay a...
Wednesday, 2 March 2016
When govt servant is entitled to get medical reimbursement for knee replacement surgery?
›
Before we proceed further, it should be noted that respondent no.1 has not denied that the petitioner was suffering fro...
Thursday, 25 February 2016
When acquittal of govt servant shall not be treated as honourable acquittal on merits?
›
What is relevant in the present case which distinguishes the case of the Appellant from the above mentioned cases is Rule 16.3 of Punja...
Thursday, 6 August 2015
Whether it is necessary to obtain sanction against each accused when prosecution is initiated by govt servant in case of defamation?
›
By careful reading of Section 199(4) of the Cr.P.C. , it does not indicate that in order to initiate criminal proceedings against the acc...
Sunday, 12 July 2015
Government Staff Should Behave Well Off Duty Too, Rules HC
›
The Hyderabad High Court has refused to accept the contention that a government employee cannot be placed under suspension for his/her ...
Wednesday, 1 July 2015
Govt servant to disclose source of funds before going abroad: Government
›
Central government employees going abroad need to disclose estimated expenditure and source of funds prior to their visits, according to ...
Friday, 5 June 2015
'Beasts in disguise' should not be in government service: Delhi High Court
›
New Delhi: Delhi High Court has passed stringent strictures against a government employee while junking his plea challenging downgrading o...
Wednesday, 27 May 2015
Whether disciplinary proceeding against govt servant can continue even after retirement even though no pecuniary loss is caused to Government?
›
It is therefore apparent, that it is not only for pecuniary loss caused to the Government that proceedings can continue after the date of ...
Tuesday, 12 May 2015
Whether there is violation of fundamental right of public servant when permission given to do him to undertake newspaper journalism is revoked?
›
As regards the reliance placed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner on the decisions of the Supreme Court in Indian Express Newsp...
Tuesday, 17 February 2015
Whether government employee can be kept suspended for more than three months if not formally informed about the charges?
›
In a remarkable judgment in service law jurisprudence, a two judge bench of the Supreme Court has held that a government employee cannot...
Saturday, 2 November 2013
What will be appropriate punishment to govt servant when misconduct committed by him is administrative in nature?
›
The proved charges remained only charge nos.4 and 6 and in both the cases the misconduct seems to be of an administrative nature rather t...
›
Home
View web version