Here in the present case, however, we have already found that the revision petitioners abstained from the appearance and failed to file written statement. Thereafter only, the record and papers were sent to the District Court and upon return of the same, the suit was transferred not beyond the Ahmednagar District Court premises but from one court to another court in the same premises. It is well known that in such circumstances, a general transfer order issued by the Principal District Judge placed on the notice board of the Bar Association is sufficient notice to the Advocates for the parties. The Advocates had, however, filed their no instruction pursis and no other Advocates were engaged by the present respondents. In view of these facts, when the suit was filed in the year 1989, now remanding the case again back to the trial court would be a travesty of justice.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (AURANGABAD BENCH)
Civil Revision Application Nos. 112, 113 and 114 of 2012
Decided On: 20.07.2015
Rameshchandra Daulal Soni and Ors.
Vs.
Devichand Hiralal Gandhi and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
M.T. Joshi, J.
Citation:2015 Bom Rent cases 399
