However, there is no power vesting with the Court even under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 to decline permission to examine a witness on the ground that he was present in the Court while recording the evidence of the other witnesses was in progress. The Court is powerless to pass such an 4 EP.1.09 order even in a case where a witness continues to remain in the Court hall notwithstanding the direction of the Court to go out of the Court. In the present case, there was no such direction issued by this Court to the said two witnesses. Therefore, in any case, such a direction as prayed by the learned counsel for the Respondent cannot be issued by this Court. Whether the evidentiary value of the evidence such witnesses is affected by the reason of the witnesses remaining present in the Court during the recording evidence of other witnesses, is a matter which will depend on the facts of the case. The Court can always examine this aspect while appreciating the evidence of such witnesses.
Bombay High Court
Indur Kartar Chhugani vs Ms. Priya Sunil Dutt on 14 January, 2011
Bench: A.S. Oka
Citation: 2011(4) AIR BOM R 272
