Sunday 27 August 2017

Whether unethical conduct of advocate amounts to moral turpitude?

“But different considerations arise where the
negligence of the Advocate is gross. It may be that
before condemning an Advocate for misconduct,
courts are inclined to examine the question as to
whether such gross negligence involves moral
turpitude or delinquency. In dealing with this
aspect of the matter, however, it is of utmost
importance to remember that the expression
"moral turpitude or delinquency" is not to receive
a narrow construction. Wherever conduct proved
against an Advocate is contrary to honesty, or
opposed to good morals, or is unethical, it may be
safely held that it involves moral turpitude. A
willful and callous disregard for the interests of
the client may, in a proper case, be characterised
as conduct unbefitting an Advocate. In dealing
with matters of professional propriety, we cannot
ignore the fact that the profession of law is an
honourable profession and it occupies a place of
pride in the liberal professions of the country.
Any conduct which makes a person unworthy to
belong to the noble fraternity of lawyers or makes
an Advocate unfit to be entrusted with the
responsible task of looking after the interests of
the litigant, must be regarded as conduct
involving moral turpitude. The
Advocates-on-record like the other members of
the Bar Advocates are Officers of the Court and
the purity of the administration of justice
depends as much on the integrity of the Judges
as on the honesty of the Bar. That is why in
dealing with the question as to whether an
Advocate has rendered himself unfit to belong to
the brotherhood at the Bar, the expression "moral
turpitude or delinquency" is not to be construed
in an unduly narrow and restricted sense.”10
[Emphasis Supplied]
12. On a careful reading of the aforesaid passage, it is
quite clear that concept of “gross negligence” cannot be
construed in a narrow or a restricted sense. It is because
honesty of an Advocate is extremely significant. The
conduct of an Advocate has to be worthy so that he can be
called as a member of the noble fraternity of lawyers. It is
his obligation to look after the interest of the litigant when is
entrusted with the responsible task in trust. An Advocate
has to bear in mind that the profession of law is a noble
one. 
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3860 OF 2007
T.A. KATHIRU KUNJU 
 V
JACOB MATHAI & ANR

Dated:February 16, 2017.

Citation: AIR 2017 SC 1041,(2017)5 SCC 755.
Read full judgment here : Click here
Print Page

No comments:

Post a Comment