How concept of Sedition as mentioned in Clause 152 of BNS is different from Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code?

 The comparison between Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act, 2023 reveals significant changes in the legal framework governing sedition in India. Below is a detailed analysis of how these two provisions differ and their implications.

Implications of Changes

 Increased Severity of Punishments

S 152 of BNS significantly increases the potential punishment for acts previously categorized under sedition. While Section 124A of IPC allowed for imprisonment up to three years, Section 150 raises this limit to seven years, with life imprisonment as a possibility for more severe offenses. This change reflects a shift towards harsher penalties for actions deemed threatening to national integrity.

Broader Scope

The new section expands the definition of offenses by including acts committed through electronic means and financial transactions. This addition raises concerns about potential overreach and misuse, as it can encompass a wide range of activities that may not have been considered seditious under Section 124A of IPC.

 Ambiguity and Enforcement

The inclusion of vague terms like "subversive activities" without clear definitions could lead to arbitrary enforcement by law enforcement agencies. This ambiguity may result in a chilling effect on free speech, as individuals may be deterred from expressing dissenting opinions for fear of being charged under this broader framework.

 Removal of Direct Reference to Government

By omitting direct references to the government, S 152 of BNS shifts the focus from targeting governmental criticism to broader national security concerns. This change could potentially criminalize a wider array of dissenting expressions that do not specifically target government actions but are perceived as threats to national integrity.

 Judicial Interpretation and Constitutional Validity

While Section 124A has been subject to judicial scrutiny and interpretation aimed at protecting free speech, S 150 of BNS may face similar challenges regarding its constitutionality due to its broad language and potential for misuse. The Supreme Court's previous rulings on sedition will likely influence how Clause 150 is applied in practice.

 Conclusion

In summary, S 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill represents a notable shift from Section 124A of the IPC by increasing penalties, broadening the scope of offenses, and introducing new means of committing those offenses. While it seeks to address issues related to national security and integrity, it also raises significant concerns regarding freedom of expression and potential misuse by authorities. The effectiveness and fairness of this new provision will depend heavily on its implementation and judicial oversight in the future.

Section 152 BNS: Acts Endangering Sovereignty, Unity and Integrity of India

Quick Summary: Section 152 is India's new "anti-sedition" law that replaced the colonial-era sedition provision (Section 124A IPC) in 1 st July 2024.

What Does Section 152 Prohibit?

The law punishes anyone who purposely or knowingly:

• Excites or attempts to excite secession (breaking away from India)

• Promotes armed rebellion against the state

• Engages in subversive activities

• Encourages separatist feelings

• Endangers India's sovereignty, unity, or integrity

Methods Covered

The offense can be committed through:

• Spoken or written words

• Signs or visible representations

• Electronic communication (social media, etc.)

• Financial means (funding separatist activities)

• Any other means

Punishment

• Life imprisonment OR

• Up to 7 years imprisonment

• Plus fine

• Non-bailable offense (no automatic bail)

• Triable by Session court

Key Protection Clause

Important: Lawful criticism of government policies to bring about change through legal means is NOT an offense under this section. This protects legitimate dissent and peaceful protest.

Recent Legal Development

In Tejender Pal Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2024), the Rajasthan High Court emphasized that Section 152 should be a "shield for national security" rather than a "sword against dissent". The court ruled there must be an imminent connection between speech and likelihood of rebellion.

Key Differences from Old Sedition Law

Aspect	Old Section 124A IPC	New Section 152 BNS
Focus	Against Government	Against India's integrity
Scope	Disaffection toward government	Broader - includes subversive activities
Language	Used "sedition"	Avoids "sedition" term

Concerns and Criticisms

• Vague terminology like "subversive activities" may lead to misuse

• Broader scope than the previous sedition law

• Risk of stifling legitimate dissent if misapplied.

Print Page