LLM Notes: The Judiciary as Guardian: How Judicial Activism Protects Fundamental Rights in India"

 The Indian judiciary has played a pivotal role in safeguarding fundamental rights through judicial activism, a proactive approach where courts interpret the Constitution expansively to address governance gaps and societal inequities. This doctrine empowers courts to intervene when legislative or executive actions infringe upon constitutional rights, ensuring justice for marginalized groups and evolving rights in line with democratic values. Below is an analysis of this concept, supported by landmark cases:

The judiciary derives its authority from key constitutional provisions:

• : Guarantees the right to constitutional remedies, enabling direct appeals to the Supreme Court for enforcement of rights.

• : Empowers High Courts to issue writs for rights protection.

• : Allow the Supreme Court to pass orders for "complete justice" and grant special leave to appeal, respectively.

These provisions enable courts to act as guardians of fundamental rights, even in the absence of legislative action.

1.

• :
  The Supreme Court reinterpreted Article 21 to include the right to livelihood and due process, overturning the restrictive interpretation in A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950). The Court ruled that any law depriving life or liberty must be "just, fair, and reasonable"

  • : Transformed Article 21 into a cornerstone for rights like privacy, healthcare, and dignity.

• :
  Recognized the right to livelihood as integral to the right to life, protecting slum dwellers from arbitrary eviction.

2.

• :
  Introduced the basic structure doctrine, asserting that Parliament cannot amend the Constitution’s core principles (e.g., judicial review, fundamental rights). This curbed legislative overreach.

• :
  Strengthened the basic structure doctrine by invalidating amendments that sought to limit judicial review

3.

• :
  Laid down Vishakha Guidelines to combat workplace sexual harassment, later codified into law in 2013.

• :
  Decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by striking down Section 377 of the IPC, affirming dignity and equality under Articles 14, 15, and 21.

4.

• :
  Established the absolute liability principle for industries causing environmental harm, ensuring compensation for victims.

• :
  Recognized the right to a speedy trial, leading to the release of under-trial prisoners detained for years without trial.

5.

• :
  Declared the right to privacy a fundamental right under Article 21, influencing subsequent rulings on data protection and autonomy.

PILs democratized access to justice by allowing citizens to petition courts on behalf of marginalized groups. Notable examples include:

• : Directed municipalities to address public health hazards.

• : U.pheld labor rights, prohibiting exploitation of workers

While judicial activism has driven social reform, critics argue it risks judicial overreach, encroaching on legislative domains. Cases like ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976), where the Court upheld suspension of habeas corpus during the Emergency, highlight occasional failures. However, subsequent rulings have reaffirmed the judiciary’s commitment to rights protection.

Conclusion

Through judicial activism, the Indian judiciary has dynamically interpreted the Constitution to address emerging challenges—from gender equality to environmental crises. Landmark cases like Maneka Gandhi, Kesavananda Bharati, and Navtej Singh Johar illustrate how courts have expanded fundamental rights, ensuring they remain relevant in a changing society. While balancing activism with restraint remains critical, this approach has solidified the judiciary’s role as the protector of India’s democratic ethos.

The Judiciary as Guardian: How Judicial Activism Protects Fundamental Rights in India

What is Judicial Activism?

·       Judicial activism is when courts take a proactive role in interpreting the Constitution to protect people’s rights, especially when the government fails to do so.

·       The judiciary acts as a guardian of fundamental rights, making sure everyone-especially marginalized groups-gets justice.

Key Constitutional Powers of the Judiciary

·       Article 32: Lets people go directly to the Supreme Court if their fundamental rights are violated.

·       Article 226: Lets High Courts issue orders (writs) to protect rights.

·       Articles 142 & 136: Allow the Supreme Court to ensure “complete justice” and hear special appeals.

These powers let courts step in even if the government or Parliament does nothing.

Landmark Cases and Principles

Case/Principle	What Happened/Established
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India	Expanded Article 21 (Right to Life) to include dignity, livelihood, and due process. Laws must be “just, fair, and reasonable.”
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corp.	Recognized right to livelihood as part of right to life. Protected slum dwellers from eviction.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala	Introduced “basic structure doctrine.” Parliament cannot change the Constitution’s core principles (like judicial review, fundamental rights).
Minerva Mills v. Union of India	Strengthened the basic structure doctrine. Invalidated amendments that tried to limit judicial review.
Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan	Laid down guidelines against workplace sexual harassment (Vishakha Guidelines), later made into law.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India	Decriminalized same-sex relations (struck down Section 377 IPC), upholding dignity and equality.
MC Mehta v. Union of India	Established absolute liability for industries causing environmental harm. Ensured compensation for victims.
Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar	Recognized right to a speedy trial. Led to release of undertrials detained for years.
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India	Declared right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21. Influenced data protection laws.

 Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

·       PILs let any citizen approach the court for the protection of public interest, especially for those who can’t afford to go to court.

·       Examples:

o   Courts ordered municipalities to fix public health hazards.

o   Courts upheld labor rights and stopped worker exploitation.

Criticism and Limitations

·       Some say judicial activism can go too far and interfere with the powers of Parliament or government.

·       Example of failure: ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976)-the Court allowed suspension of habeas corpus (right to challenge detention) during the Emergency.

·       However, later cases have reaffirmed the judiciary’s commitment to protecting rights.

Conclusion (Easy to Memorize)

·       Judicial activism means courts actively protect fundamental rights.

·       The judiciary uses its constitutional powers to fill gaps left by the government.

·       Landmark cases (like Maneka Gandhi, Kesavananda Bharati, Navtej Singh Johar) show how courts expanded rights.

·       PILs make justice accessible to all.

·       While there are risks of overreach, judicial activism has made the judiciary the protector of India’s democracy and rights.

Quick Mnemonic for Exam:

“JUDGES MAKE RIGHTS LIVE”

·       Judicial activism

·       Upholds Constitution

·       Direct access (Art. 32, 226)

·       Guards marginalized

·       Expands rights (Maneka, Kesavananda, Navtej)

·       Social reforms (PILs, Vishakha, MC Mehta)

Remember: Courts protect rights, fill government gaps, landmark cases expand justice!

Print Page