Friday, 30 May 2025

LLM Notes: Legislative Reforms vs. Ground Realities: India's Struggle to Eliminate Child Labour by 2025


 India faces a significant challenge with child labour, with current data indicating that the country may struggle to meet its international commitments to eliminate this practice by 2025. Recent legislative developments and parliamentary assessments reveal both progress and persistent challenges.

Recent Legislative Developments

Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016

The most significant recent development was the 2016 amendment to the original 1986 Act, which introduced several key changes.

  • Complete prohibition of employment of children below 14 years in any occupation

  • New category of "adolescent" (14-18 years) with restrictions on hazardous work

  • Stricter penalties: Minimum imprisonment increased from 3 months to 6 months, and maximum from 1 year to 2 years

  • Higher fines: Minimum fine increased from ₹10,000 to ₹20,000, and maximum from ₹20,000 to ₹50,000

  • Cognizable offence: Police can now arrest without warrant and investigate without court permission

Constitutional Framework

India's legal framework includes strong constitutional provisions:

  • Article 24: Prohibits employment of children below 14 in factories, mines, or hazardous occupations

  • Article 21A: Guarantees free and compulsory education for children aged 6-14

  • Article 39: Directs state policy toward protecting children's health and strength

Challenges in Achieving 2025 Target

Recent parliamentary assessments paint a concerning picture regarding India's ability to meet its international commitments. A 2023 Parliamentary Standing Committee report concluded that it is "practically not possible" for India to eliminate child labour by 2025.

Key Implementation Challenges

The parliamentary committee identified several critical issues:

  • Legal ambiguity: Different definitions of "child" across various laws create confusion

  • Enforcement gaps: Under the Juvenile Justice Act 2015, employing children illegally is a non-cognizable offence, creating procedural hurdles

  • Insufficient deterrence: Despite increased penalties, recidivism remains high, with rescued children often returning to the same jobs

  • Resource constraints: Limited manpower and budgetary allocation for enforcement

Policy Recommendations and Way Forward

Parliamentary committees and research organizations have suggested several measures:

Legislative Improvements

  • Uniform definition of "child" across all laws

  • Making child labour offences cognizable under all relevant acts

  • Further increasing penalties (3-4 times current levels)

  • Including stricter punishments like license cancellation and property attachment

Enforcement Mechanisms

  • Creation of district-level rehabilitation funds

  • Improved coordination between central and state governments

  • Enhanced monitoring and inspection systems

  • Better utilization of fines collected from violators

Addressing Root Causes
The research identifies three primary causes requiring attention:

  • Acute poverty requiring comprehensive poverty alleviation programs

  • Widespread illiteracy necessitating improved educational access

  • Ignorance about child labour consequences requiring awareness campaigns

Recent Legislative Developments: The 2016 Amendment

The most significant recent legislative development in India's fight against child labor was the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act of 2016, which substantially strengthened the original 1986 legislation. This amendment represents a paradigm shift in India's approach to child labor by introducing comprehensive prohibitions and enhanced enforcement mechanisms.

The 2016 amendment fundamentally redefined the legal framework by prohibiting the employment of children (defined as those below 14 years) in all occupations and processes, with only two specific exceptions. Previously, the 1986 Act only prohibited children from working in 18 specific occupations and 65 processes deemed hazardous. The new legislation broadened the scope to create a near-total ban on child employment, marking a significant advancement in child protection.

A crucial innovation of the 2016 amendment was the introduction of the "adolescent" category, defining individuals between 14-18 years as adolescents who are permitted to work but prohibited from engaging in hazardous occupations and processes. This distinction acknowledges the developmental needs of older children while providing them with regulated work opportunities that do not compromise their education or safety.

The amendment significantly enhanced penalties for violations, with employers now facing imprisonment of six months to two years and fines ranging from ₹20,000 to ₹50,000. Repeat offenders face even stricter penalties, with imprisonment extending from one to three years. Importantly, the legislation includes provisions protecting parents and guardians from punishment in first-time offenses, recognizing the complex socioeconomic factors that drive families to engage children in work.

The establishment of the Child and Adolescent Labour Rehabilitation Fund represents another critical innovation of the 2016 amendment. This district-level fund, financed through fines collected from violators and government contributions, provides financial support for rehabilitation activities, ensuring that rescued children receive adequate support for education, vocational training, and reintegration into society.

Digital Initiatives and Monitoring Systems

Recognizing the need for enhanced coordination and monitoring, the Ministry of Labour and Employment launched the PENCIL (Platform for Effective Enforcement for No Child Labour) portal in 2017. This digital platform serves as a comprehensive system connecting central government, state governments, districts, civil society organizations, and the public in the fight against child labor.

The PENCIL portal facilitates several critical functions including complaint registration, case tracking, progress monitoring, and data management. Citizens can file complaints regarding child labor incidents online, which are automatically assigned to designated nodal officers for appropriate action. The platform also enables the monitoring of National Child Labour Project (NCLP) activities and provides dashboards for assessing progress across different regions.

However, the PENCIL portal has faced challenges in achieving its full potential. Many states and union territories were not initially onboarded onto the platform, and the complaint registration mechanism has not achieved widespread utilization. The Ministry has initiated efforts to integrate PENCIL with Mission Vatsalya and Childline (1098) to create a more comprehensive child protection ecosystem.

Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programs

The National Child Labour Project (NCLP) scheme, initiated in 1988 and subsequently subsumed under Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan in 2021, represents India's primary rehabilitation initiative for working children. Under this scheme, children aged 9-14 years are rescued from hazardous work and enrolled in Special Training Centres (STCs) where they receive bridge education, vocational training, mid-day meals, stipends, and healthcare before being mainstreamed into formal education.

The integration of NCLP with Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan has created opportunities for better coordination between child labor elimination and education initiatives. This convergence approach seeks to address the educational gaps that often contribute to child labor while providing comprehensive support for children transitioning from work to school.

International Cooperation and Technical Assistance

India's child labor elimination efforts have been supported by various international partnerships and technical assistance programs. The International Labour Organization's International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) has been operational in India since 1992, making India the first country to join this global initiative.

A significant milestone was the launch of a US$40 million joint program in 2004 involving the Government of India, the US Department of Labor, and the ILO, targeting 80,000 children in hazardous industries. This represented the largest child labor elimination program ever undertaken by the ILO at the country level and focused on prevention, withdrawal, and rehabilitation of children in ten hazardous sectors across 21 districts in five states.

The program's approach included direct intervention with working children, capacity building for national and local institutions, awareness generation, and the creation of sustainable models for replication in other regions. The success of such international cooperation demonstrates the value of technical expertise, financial resources, and global best practices in addressing complex child labor challenges.

Sectoral Focus: Agriculture and Rural Child Labor

Agriculture remains the dominant sector employing child laborers in India, with approximately 60% of working children engaged in farming and related activities. This concentration reflects the rural nature of India's child labor problem, where agricultural families often depend on children's contributions for survival, particularly in regions affected by drought, crop failure, or seasonal migration patterns.

Children in agriculture face numerous hazards including exposure to pesticides and fertilizers, operation of dangerous machinery, carrying heavy loads, and working in extreme weather conditions. The seasonal nature of agricultural work often leads to family migration, disrupting children's education and increasing their vulnerability to exploitation.

Maharashtra exemplifies the complex challenges of agricultural child labor, where 60.67% of working children are engaged in farming activities. In drought-prone regions like Marathwada, large-scale migration during sugarcane-cutting seasons often involves entire families, leading to increased school dropouts and children working alongside their parents in destination areas.

The invisibility of agricultural child labor poses significant challenges for monitoring and enforcement. Unlike factory settings, agricultural work occurs in dispersed rural locations that are difficult to inspect regularly. Additionally, the classification of children "helping" family farms often blurs the line between acceptable assistance and exploitative labor.

Gender Dimensions and Hidden Forms of Child Labor

While boys constitute approximately 55% of working children in India, girls face distinct challenges that often remain invisible in official statistics. According to UNICEF, girls are twice as likely to be out of school and significantly more likely to be engaged in domestic work within households. The 2016 amendment's provision allowing children to work in "family enterprises" has raised concerns about potentially legitimizing the exploitation of girl children in domestic settings.

Approximately 38% of girls in child labor situations are typically unreported due to their engagement in "hidden" forms of work such as domestic service, caregiving, and household chores. This invisibility makes it particularly challenging to develop effective interventions and support systems for girl children, who may also face additional risks including early marriage and gender-based violence.

The intersection of gender, caste, and economic status creates multiple vulnerabilities for children from marginalized communities. Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes show higher incidences of child labor, with children from these communities facing compounded disadvantages that perpetuate cycles of exploitation and exclusion.

Future Prospects and Policy Recommendations

India's Parliament Standing Committee on Labour, Textiles and Skill Development has acknowledged that achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goal of eliminating child labor by 2025 is "practically not possible" given current progress rates. This sobering assessment highlights the need for dramatically scaled-up interventions and systemic reforms to address root causes.

The committee has identified several critical areas requiring immediate attention, including the establishment of uniform legal definitions of "child" across various employment laws to eliminate confusion and loopholes. Currently, different legislation defines childhood differently, creating enforcement challenges and opportunities for exploitation.

Enhanced coordination between central and state governments, stronger budget allocations for enforcement and rehabilitation, and comprehensive training programs for implementing agencies represent essential components of any accelerated response strategy. The creation of dedicated courts for child labor cases could significantly improve conviction rates and serve as a deterrent to potential violators.

Addressing the demand side of child labor through stronger corporate accountability mechanisms, supply chain monitoring, and consumer awareness campaigns could complement existing supply-side interventions. Companies operating in sectors with high child labor risks need robust due diligence systems and remediation mechanisms to ensure child-free production processes.

Conclusion

India's position as the country with the highest absolute number of child laborers reflects a complex interplay of poverty, inequality, inadequate educational access, and enforcement challenges that cannot be addressed through legislation alone. While the 2016 amendment to the Child Labour Act represents significant progress in strengthening legal protections, the persistent gaps between policy intentions and ground-level implementation continue to undermine children's rights and India's development aspirations.

 Moving forward, India requires a comprehensive, multi-sectoral approach that addresses root causes while strengthening enforcement mechanisms, rehabilitation programs, and prevention strategies.

Success in eliminating child labor will ultimately depend on sustained political will, adequate resource allocation, enhanced institutional capacity, and the recognition that child protection is fundamental to India's long-term economic and social development. The challenge is immense, but the moral imperative and development benefits of creating a child labor-free India make this one of the most critical policy priorities for the nation's future.

While India has made significant legislative progress, particularly through the 2016 amendments that strengthened penalties and enforcement mechanisms, the country faces substantial challenges in eliminating child labour by 2025. The projected 7.43 million child labourers in 2025 indicates that current efforts need to be "scaled up seven times". Success will require coordinated action across multiple fronts, including stronger enforcement, addressing poverty and education gaps, and ensuring uniform legal frameworks across all jurisdictions.

India's Child Labor Crisis: Key Points and Legislative Developments

Sectoral Concentration

  • Agriculture dominates child labor employment with 60% of working children engaged in farming and related activities

  • Other major sectors include brick kilns, carpet weaving, garment manufacturing, domestic service, and mining

  • Informal economy hosts majority of child labor cases, making monitoring and enforcement particularly challenging

2016 Legislative Amendment - Key Changes

  • Comprehensive ban on employment of children below 14 years in all occupations except family enterprises and entertainment industry with conditions

  • Introduction of "adolescent" category (14-18 years) permitted to work but prohibited from hazardous occupations

  • Enhanced penalties: imprisonment of 6 months to 2 years and fines of ₹20,000 to ₹50,000 for first-time offenders

Digital Monitoring Systems

  • PENCIL (Platform for Effective Enforcement for No Child Labour) portal launched in 2017 for complaint registration and case tracking

  • Integration challenges with many states not initially onboarded and limited utilization of complaint mechanisms

  • Efforts underway to integrate with Mission Vatsalya and Childline (1098) for comprehensive child protection.

International Cooperation

  • India became first country to join ILO's International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) in 1992

  • US$40 million joint program launched in 2004 targeting 80,000 children in hazardous industries across 21 districts

  • Technical assistance and global best practices support national elimination efforts

Gender and Hidden Labor

  • Girls constitute 45% of working children but face higher rates of invisible domestic work and household responsibilities

  • Twice as likely to be out of school with 38% of girls in child labor situations typically unreported

  • "Family enterprise" provisions in 2016 amendment raise concerns about legitimizing exploitation of girl children

Agricultural Focus

  • 60% of child laborers work in agriculture, facing hazards from pesticides, dangerous machinery, and extreme weather

  • Seasonal migration patterns disrupt education and increase vulnerability to exploitation

  • Maharashtra exemplifies challenges with 60.67% of working children in farming activities, particularly in drought-prone regions

Future Challenges and Recommendations

  • Parliament Standing Committee acknowledges UN SDG target of eliminating child labor by 2025 is "practically not possible"

  • Need for uniform legal definitions across employment laws to eliminate confusion and enforcement loopholes

  • Enhanced coordination between central and state governments with stronger budget allocations required

Policy Priorities

  • Establishment of dedicated courts for child labor cases to improve conviction rates

  • Corporate accountability mechanisms and supply chain monitoring to address demand-side factors

  • Comprehensive training programs for implementing agencies and law enforcement officials

  • Multi-sectoral approach addressing root causes of poverty, inequality, and inadequate educational access.


Print Page

No comments:

Post a Comment