Anticipatory Breach of Contract: Navigating Pre-Performance Violations Under Indian Law

 Statutory Framework

Primary Legislation: Anticipatory breach of contract in India is primarily governed by Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This section states that when a party refuses to perform or disables themselves from performing their promise entirely, the promisee may terminate the contract unless they have signified their acquiescence in its continuance.

Supplementary Provisions: Section 60 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically addresses anticipatory breach in sale contracts, providing that if either party repudiates the contract before delivery, the other party may either wait until the delivery date or treat the contract as rescinded and sue for damages.

Definition and Essential Elements

Meaning: Anticipatory breach occurs when one party indicates, before performance is due, that they will not fulfill their contractual obligations. For a valid anticipatory breach claim under Indian law, the following essentials must be present:

• There must be a contract with a future date for performance

• Either party should refuse to perform or willfully induce circumstances making performance impossible

• The performance must become impossible, not merely unlikely or economically infeasible

• Such refusal or impossibility should occur before the actual performance date

• Refusal can be expressed or implied

Types of Anticipatory Breach

Express Repudiation: This occurs when a party explicitly declares their unwillingness or inability to perform the contract, such as when a seller informs a buyer before delivery that they will not supply goods.

Implied Repudiation: This arises when a party's actions or conduct imply they will not fulfill obligations, for example, when a contractor abandons a construction project midway without justification.

Rights and Remedies Under Indian Law

When anticipatory breach occurs, the non-breaching party has two primary options under Indian law:

Terminate the Contract: The aggrieved party can choose to terminate the contract immediately and seek damages, allowing them to mitigate losses and pursue alternative arrangements.

Affirm the Contract: Alternatively, they may keep the contract alive until the performance date, providing the breaching party an opportunity to fulfill obligations. If performance fails on the due date, damages can then be claimed.

Available Remedies

Monetary Damages: The injured party can claim compensation for financial losses, including the benefit they would have received under the contract or compensation for net gains that would have occurred without the breach.

Restitution: This remedy puts the injured party in the same position as before the contract was made, focusing on repaying money or property paid to the breaching party. However, choosing restitution bars claiming additional damages.

Compensation Under Section 75: If the aggrieved party chooses to repudiate the contract, they are entitled to claim compensation under Section 75 of the Indian Contract Act.

Judicial Interpretation

The Supreme Court of India in Jawahar Lal Wadhwa vs. Hariprada Chatroberty (AIR 1989 SC 606) established key principles:

"It is settled in law that where a party to a contract commits an anticipatory breach of the contract, the other party to the contract may treat the breach as putting an end to the contract and sue for damages, but in that event he cannot ask for specific performance. The other option open to the other party, namely, the aggrieved party, is that he may choose to keep the contract alive till the time for performance and claim specific performance, but, in that event, he cannot claim specific performance of the contract unless he shows his readiness and willingness to perform the contract."

Key Distinctions from Actual Breach

Cause of Action: In anticipatory breach, the cause of action arises when the party expresses refusal or when performance becomes inevitable, not on the actual performance date.

Remedies: While actual breach typically allows for specific performance under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, anticipatory breach provides the aggrieved party the election to either repudiate or continue the contract.

Legal Benefits and Practical Implications

Mitigation of Damages: The doctrine helps both parties prevent or reduce losses that may be caused by actual breach, as the aggrieved party can take preemptory measures and claim damages before the performance date.

Business Convenience: The doctrine exists for ease of doing business, saving time and money while providing flexible alternatives for contract repudiation.

Equity and Justice: The doctrine is based on broad principles of equity, justice, and good conscience, removing the impediment of seeking remedy only after the actual performance date.

The Indian legal framework for anticipatory breach thus provides comprehensive protection to contracting parties while maintaining flexibility in commercial relationships, ensuring that aggrieved parties can seek timely remedies without waiting for actual breach to occur.

Print Page