Difference Between Criminal Breach of Trust and Misappropriation of Property under BNS
1. Criminal Breach of Trust (Section 316, BNS,S 405 of IPC)
Key Elements:
-
Entrustment: Property must be entrusted to the accused, creating a fiduciary relationship.
-
Dishonest Misuse: The accused dishonestly misuses, converts, or disposes of the property against the terms of the trust or contract.
-
Violation of Trust: The act must be contrary to the purpose for which the property was entrusted.
Examples:
-
An employee entrusted with company funds uses them for personal expenses.
-
A banker entrusted with a client’s money uses it for personal gain.
2. Misappropriation of Property (Section 314, BNS,S 403 of IPC)
Key Elements:
-
No Entrustment Required: The property need not be entrusted; it may come into possession by chance, accident, or other means.
-
Movable Property Only: Applies only to movable property.
-
Dishonest Conversion: The person converts the property for personal use, knowing it belongs to someone else.
Examples:
-
Finding a lost wallet and keeping it instead of returning it.
-
Using someone else’s property that came into your possession by mistake.
3. Key Differences
| Aspect | Criminal Breach of Trust (Sec 316 BNS) | Misappropriation of Property (Sec 314 BNS) |
|---|---|---|
| Entrustment | Essential; property must be entrusted | Not required; property may come by chance |
| Type of Property | Movable or immovable | Movable only |
| Nature of Offence | Breach of trust relationship | No trust relationship; mere dishonest taking |
| Example | Employee misusing company funds | Keeping a found wallet |
| Legal Relationship | Fiduciary/contractual | No fiduciary/contractual relationship |
| Criteria | Criminal Breach of Trust | Misappropriation of Property |
|---|---|---|
| Entrustment | Required | Not required |
| Property Type | Movable & immovable | Movable only |
| Relationship | Fiduciary/trust | None |
| Example | Misuse of entrusted funds | Keeping found property |
| Section (BNS) | 316 | 314 |
Conclusion |
-
Entrustment is the core difference: breach of trust requires it, misappropriation does not.
-
Both require dishonest intent, but breach of trust involves a violation of a specific trust or contract, while misappropriation is a general dishonest conversion of property.
Practical Example
The difference can be illustrated through a simple example: If person A finds a wallet on the street containing money and owner's identification, but instead of returning it, uses the money for personal benefit, this constitutes criminal misappropriation. However, if person A is given jewelry by person B to keep safe during a wedding ceremony and then refuses to return it afterwards, this constitutes criminal breach of trust because the property was specifically entrusted to A.
The fundamental distinction lies in the element of trust - criminal breach of trust requires a pre-existing relationship of trust and entrustment, while criminal misappropriation can occur even when property comes into possession accidentally or through other means.
No comments:
Post a Comment