Saturday, 23 May 2026

Supreme Court Guidelines regarding Passive Euthanasia- Harish Rana judgment

 327. For the reasons stated hereinabove and in the concurring opinion, we hereby dispose of the present MA with the following directions:

(a) The medical treatment, including CANH, being administered to the applicant shall be withdrawn and/or withheld.

(b) In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present matter, the reconsideration period of 30 days stands waived, as all stakeholders are unanimous in their opinion that the medical treatment being administered to the applicant be withdrawn and/or withheld.

(c) The respondent no. 2/AIIMS shall grant admission to the applicant in its Palliative Care department so that the withdrawal and/or withholding of the applicant's medical treatment, including CANH, can be given effect to. For this purpose, respondent no. 2/AIIMS shall provide all necessary facilities for shifting the applicant from his residence to the said Palliative Care department.

(d) The respondent no. 2/AIIMS shall ensure that such withdrawal and/or withholding is carried out through a robust palliative and EOL care plan, which is specifically tailored to manage symptoms without causing any discomfort to the applicant, and ensuring that his dignity is preserved to the highest degree.

(e) The High Courts of all States shall issue appropriate directions to all Judicial Magistrates of First Class (JMFC) within their jurisdiction to receive intimation from the hospital, in accordance with the guidelines as laid down in Common Cause (supra), in the event the primary medical board and secondary medical board are unanimous in their decision to withdraw and/or withhold the medical treatment of any patient.

(f) The respondent no. 1/Union of India in coordination with the respective Secretaries of Health & Family Welfare of all States/UTs, shall ensure that the CMOs of all concerned districts across the country, forthwith prepare and maintain a panel consisting of registered medical practitioners possessing qualifications in accordance with the guidelines as laid down in Common Cause (supra), for the purpose of nomination to the secondary medical board. The panel so prepared shall be periodically reviewed and updated by the CMOs at regular intervals not exceeding twelve months, so as to ensure availability, suitability, and continued compliance with the requirements under the guidelines as laid down in Common Cause (supra). It shall be the duty of the Secretaries of Health & Family Welfare of each State/UT to make sure that such periodic review and updation at regular intervals is undertaken by the CMOs of all districts falling within their respective State/UT.


 In the Supreme Court of India

(Before J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ.)


Harish Rana Vs Union of India and Others 


Miscellaneous Application No. 2238 of 2025 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 18225 of 2024

Decided on March 11, 2026

Print Page

No comments:

Post a Comment