It is not in dispute that the suit land is the ancestral property
and the plaintiffs are Hindu governed by Mitakshara Law. It is also not
disputed that alienation is made by defendant No. 1 Bhikarchand who is
father of plaintiffs No. 1 to 5. Article 109 of the Limitation Act lays downperiod of 12 years and the time from which period begins to run is when
the alienee takes the possession of the property. In the instant case, in
pursuance to the sale deed dated 08/04/1969, defendant No. 2 took
possession on 08/04/1969. The Suit is instituted in the year 1980, which is
well within 12 years and, therefore, can not be said to be barred by
limitation. I, therefore, do not find that the learned District Judge
committed any error in decreeing the Suit.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO.103 OF 1990
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO.103 OF 1990
Basheer s/o. Amir Patel v. Dnyaneshwar S/o. Bhikarchand
CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J.
DATE OF JUDGMENT : 24th NOVEMBER,2014.
Citation; 2015(5) MHLJ 853