We have perused the papers as well as the said statements.
The statement reveals that Pratap was forcibly kept at the said
rehabilitation centre at the behest of his wife. Pratap had stated
that for his addiction for gutka he was kept in the rehabilitation
centre. {Para 6}
11. Thus considering the aforesaid, it is clear that Pratap was
unnecessarily detained at the said rehabilitation centre at the
behest of his wife.
12. We are not shown any medical papers of Pratap to show
that he was required to be admitted to the rehabilitation centre.
Hence, in view of the aforesaid, we permit Pratap to go alongwith the petitioner.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 13818 OF 2023
Jayendra Narandas Bhatia Vs State of Maharashtra
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
GAURI GODSE, JJ.
DATE : 18th AUGUST 2023
Print Page