The globalization of commerce and increasing cross-border transactions have made the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments a critical aspect of India's legal framework. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) provides the primary mechanism through which Indian courts evaluate, recognize, and enforce judicial decisions rendered by foreign courts. This comprehensive system balances international judicial comity with the protection of Indian legal sovereignty and public policy.
Monday, 23 June 2025
Thursday, 14 December 2023
Article on Recognition and enforcement of foreign divorce decrees in India
Recognition of foreign divorce decrees in India is a complex legal issue that involves the interplay of private international law, Indian family law, and the concept of comity of nations.
Comity of Nations
Comity of nations is a principle of international law that requires courts to respect and give effect to the judgments and decrees of foreign courts, subject to certain conditions. This principle is based on mutual respect and cooperation between nations and aims to avoid legal conflicts and promote international harmony.
Print PageSaturday, 15 May 2021
Whether decree of the foreign court is enforceable even if it does not contain any reason?
Section 2(9) defines a “judgment” to mean “the statement
given by the Judge of the grounds of a decree or order”. A “decree”, on the other hand, under Section 2(2), means “the formal expression of an adjudication” which, so far as regards the Court expressing it, conclusively determines the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit. An order, on the other hand, defined in Section 2(14), means “the formal expression of any decision of a Civil Court which is not a decree”. The CPC consolidates and amends laws relating to the procedure of courts of civil judicature in India. So far as our civil courts are
concerned, the code makes a clear distinction between a judgment, on the
one hand, and a decree or order, on the other. The latter two are formal
expressions of adjudication or decision of civil courts, whereas the former, a
judgment, is a statement of the grounds of such decree or order given by
the Judge. In so far, however, as judgments of reciprocating territories or
foreign judgments are concerned, the expression “decree” is defined under
Section 44A to mean “any decree or judgment of such Court under which a
sum of money is payable, not being a sum payable in respect of taxes or
other charges of a like nature or in respect of fine or other penalty”. What
is executed under Section 44A is a “decree” of any superior court of a
reciprocating territory and such decree means a decree or judgment of such
court as explained in Explanation II of Section 44A. In other words, so far
as execution of foreign decrees is concerned, the Code does not make any
distinction between a “decree” and a “judgment”. Any adjudication by a
foreign court upon a matter before it, including a formal expression of such
adjudication, is executable under Section 44A. This much appears from a
plain reading of the relevant provisions of the CPC. {Para 11}
12 Privy Council in the case of Brijlal Ramjidas vs. Govindram G. Seksaria AIR 1947 PRIVY COUNCIL 192 held that a “judgment” within the meaning of Section 13 of the
CPC meant “an adjudication by a foreign court upon the matter before it” and not a statement of reasons for the order. Authorities cited by Mr.Sakhardande for the proposition that in order to constitute a judgment, the order must contain reasons (Balraj Taneja vs. Sunil Madan (1999) 8 SCC 396 and Assistant Commissioner vs. Shukla and Bros. (2010) 4 SCC 785) are quite beside the point, since they do not deal with foreign judgments, but with judgments rendered by civil courts in India.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2020
Arvind Jeram Kotecha Vs Prabhudas Damodar Kotecha ..
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE & MADHAV JAMDAR, JJ.
PRONOUNCED ON : 9 NOVEMBER 2020
JUDGMENT (Per S.C. Gupte, J.) :
Print Page