So far as the issue of improper valuation and inadequate
payment of court fee is concerned the objection of counsel for
petitioners is on the plea that the suit should have been valued
on the basis of gift deed under challenge and accordingly the
advalorem court fee should have been paid.
12/ A perusal of the plaint reveals that the plaintiffs are
claiming the suit property to be joint family property and alleged
gift deed has been executed by defendant no. 2 in favour of
defendants no. 3 & 4. Plaintiffs are not party to the gift deed
and the prayer in the suit is to declare the gift deed as null and
void and not binding on the plaintiffs.
13/ The record further reflects that plaintiffs have valued the
suit as per their share in the suit property and have accordingly
paid the court fee thereon and in respect of declaration relating
to gift deed the fix court fee has been paid and separate court
fee on the relief of permanent injunction has been paid.
14/ In view of the judgment of the Supreme court in the
matter of Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh
& others reported in 2010 AIR SCW 3308 when the plaintiff is
not party to the gift deed and is claiming partition and injunction
then he is not liable to pay the advalorem court fee on the said
relief. Trial court has rightly examined the legal position in this
regard while holding that the advalorem court fee as per value
of the gift deed is not payable.
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
(S.B.: HON. SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA)
Civil Revision No. 136/2011
Vishal Vs. Hukumchand (dead) through his L.Rs.& others
O R D E R
(Passed on 22/4/2019 )
Citation: AIR 2019(NOC) 736 MP
Print Page