The only other aspect of the matter to which Mr. Damle adverts is his submission that the Will is "suspicious" because the bequest is, he says, to the Executors. He encourages me to read with him the Will in this fashion and to hold that because the Will makes provision for payment to Mr. Damania and Mr. Pikale of their legal costs and gives them the discretion to decide the amount and direction of the charitable bequests, that it is, in fact, a bequest to them. To begin with, this has nothing whatever to do with the due execution of the Will. It relates to the contents of the Will. This does not in and of itself disprove the due execution and attestation of the testamentary instrument.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Testamentary Suit No. 28 of 1995 in Testamentary Petition No. 41 of 1995
Decided On: 09.06.2016
Kirit Navnitlal Damania and Ors. Vs. Anuradha Anil Bhagwat and Ors.
Coram:G.S. Patel, J.
