In Bhavan Vaja and others (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that it is the duty of the Executing Court to find out the true effect of a decree as passed though it cannot go behind such decree in the execution proceedings. For construing a decree, the Executing Court can take into consideration the pleadings as well as the proceedings leading up to the decree. That is the plain duty of the Executing Court. In Darshan Singh (supra) it has been observed that the corrections contemplated under Section 152 of the Code are only accidental omissions or mistakes. A clerical mistake is a mistake in writing or typing and the same can be duly corrected in exercise of that power. As noted above in the present case the compromise memo has been correctly prepared and it is only the award which contains an erroneous reproduction of Clause 2 of the compromise memo. The mistake is therefore accidental as well as clerical in nature. The observations in Tulashiram Nivarutthi Shendge (supra) that even in the matters of the present type, the Executing Court can exercise powers under Section 152 of the Code for correcting an award support the case of the respondent No. 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (NAGPUR BENCH)
Writ Petition No. 02 of 2019
Decided On: 14.03.2019
Dhanraj Dnyaneshwar Koche Vs. Rajiv Ramdattaji Batra and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
A.S. Chandurkar, J.
Citation: 2019(4) MHLJ 664
