It is pertinent to note that without exhausting
the remedy before the Forensic Laboratory of Karnataka,
sending the voice sample to the Truth Labs, which is a
private agency and collecting the report which is been
placed as a gospel truth in filing the charge sheet has also
resulted in affecting the rights of the accused. Therefore,
the very cognizance itself should not have been taken by
the learned Special Judge and charge sheet should have
been returned. {Para 19}.
The Karnataka High Court upheld a trial court order discharging a public servant of graft charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act as the Lokayukta police sent the voice sample of the conversation between the official and the complainant wherein he allegedly demanded a bribe, to a private agency instead of sending it to government Forensic Science Laboratory for analysis.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
CRL.RP No. 699 of 2017
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs G. RAMACHARI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
Citation: 2024:KHC:50561.
Print Page

