instrument, as the same one, that had been robbed, has been
satisfactorily established. It may be recalled that the IMEI number
of the mobile telephone instrument has not been brought on
record. It was easily possible for the investigating agency to have
collected such information, so as to fix the identity of the mobile
telephone instrument, as the same that was being used by the first
informant Ashok. Even assuming that Ashok did not know the
IMEI number, it was easily possible to ascertain the same from the
connectivity number i.e. the mobile telephone number itself. The
same, however, has not been done.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1291 of 2012
ARUN MARUTI WAGHCHAURE V/s. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATE : 19th MARCH 2015.
Citation; 2015 ALLMR(CRI)4339 Bom
