Showing posts with label physiotherapist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label physiotherapist. Show all posts

Saturday, 14 September 2024

Supreme Court: If injured is below the age of 15 years, multiplier of 18 shall be applicable for calculation of compensation, attendant and physiotherapist charges

It is also relevant to observe that in the judgment of Sarla Verma (Smt.) and Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation and Anr.   MANU/SC/0606/2009 : (2009) 6 SCC 121 and National Insurance Co. Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Ors.   MANU/SC/1366/2017 : (2017) 16 SCC 680, while replacing the Schedule of Motor Vehicle Act, it is not made clear what multiplier would be applicable below the age of 15. In the case of Kajal (supra), the injured was 12 years of the age, however, the multiplier of 18 has been applied. Therefore, taking guidance from the judgment of Kajal (supra), for determination of the compensation in the present case, the multiplier of 18 shall be applicable. {Para 15}

18. The Tribunal awarded Rs. 1,92,000/- in the head of attendant charges @ 1,000/- per month. While the High Court proceeded on the premises that the rate of the attendant charges is variable after every five years, however, the Court calculated the amount @ Rs. 2,000/- thereafter @ Rs. 4,000/- per month for a period of 20 years and accordingly determined Rs. 9,00,000/- making enhancement of Rs. 7,08,000/- in the said head. As discussed, if we apply the multiplier method and in view of the judgment of Kajal (supra), we accept the rate of attendant charges Rs. 5000/- per month for 12 hours, looking to the nature of injuries and disability the claimant is required two attendants at least within 24 hours then the expenses in the head of attendant charges comes to Rs. 10,000/- per month. If we apply the multiplier of 18, the amount comes to Rs. 21,60,000/-.


19. Similarly for medical expenses in the head of physiotherapy required to the claimant, the Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,88,000/- @ Rs. 50 per day. The High Court granted lumpsum amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- including the expenses for diapers. In our considered opinion, the said amount is not adequate. In these days the physiotherapist would charge at least Rs. 150/- per day to treat the patient for one hour which monthly comes to Rs. 4,500/- and annually 54,000/-, applying the multiplier of 18, the amount in the head of physiotherapy charges comes to Rs. 9,72,000/-. For the purpose of use of diapers, regular medical check-up and medical expenses if we further add Rs. 2,00,000/- then in the head of future medical expenses the amount comes to Rs. 11,72,000/-.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 4648 of 2022.

Decided On: 06.07.2022

Abhimanyu Partap Singh Vs. Namita Sekhon and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

Indira Banerjee and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.

Author: J.K. Maheshwari, J.

Citation: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 793,MANU/SC/0821/2022.

Read full Judgment here: Click here.


Print Page

Supreme Court grants Motorized wheel chair lump-sum charges rupees 2,50,000/- in Motor accident claim case

 Under the head of transportation, the MACT awarded only Rs. 15,000/- for the visit Delhi to Chandigarh which is enhanced by the High Court to the tune of Rs. 50,000/-. The High Court further awarded Rs. 1,00,000/- in the head of motorized wheel chair. In our opinion, during the life span grant of amount for motorized vehicle only for once is not just. Similarly, in the head of transportation in future, therefore, we enhance the said amount in lumpsum to Rs. 2,50,000/- in place of Rs. 1,00,000/- + Rs. 50,000/- as awarded by the High Court. {Para 20}

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 4648 of 2022.

Decided On: 06.07.2022

Abhimanyu Partap Singh Vs. Namita Sekhon and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

Indira Banerjee and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.

Author: J.K. Maheshwari, J.

Citation: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 793,MANU/SC/0821/2022.

Read full Judgment here: Click here.

Print Page

Supreme Court: The multiplier system should be followed for determining the physiotherapist charges in Motor accident claim petition

Similarly for medical expenses in the head of physiotherapy required to the claimant, the Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,88,000/- @ Rs. 50 per day. The High Court granted lumpsum amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- including the expenses for diapers. In our considered opinion, the said amount is not adequate. In these days the physiotherapist would charge at least Rs. 150/- per day to treat the patient for one hour which monthly comes to Rs. 4,500/- and annually 54,000/-, applying the multiplier of 18, the amount in the head of physiotherapy charges comes to Rs. 9,72,000/-. For the purpose of use of diapers, regular medical check-up and medical expenses if we further add Rs. 2,00,000/- then in the head of future medical expenses the amount comes to Rs. 11,72,000/-. {Para 19}

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 4648 of 2022.

Decided On: 06.07.2022

Abhimanyu Partap Singh Vs. Namita Sekhon and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

Indira Banerjee and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.

Author: J.K. Maheshwari, J.

Citation: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 793,MANU/SC/0821/2022.

Read full Judgment here: Click here.

Print Page

Supreme Court grants Loss of amenities of life and marital bliss, pain and sufferings, loss of enjoyment and loss of expectancy rupees 4,00,000/ in motor accident claim case

 The MACT awarded Rs. 4,00,000/- in the head of loss of expectation of life, loss of marital bliss, total loss of enjoyment of life and amenities of life, permanent disability, pain and sufferings while the High Court granted the same amount bifurcating it in the head of loss of amenities in life and marital bliss to Rs. 3,00,000/- while special diet Rs. 1,00,000/- making the total Rs. 4,00,000/-.

{Para 22}

23. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of injuries in our considered opinion, the Appellant is entitled for a sum of Rs. 4,00,000/- in the head of loss of amenities of life and marital bliss, pain and sufferings, loss of enjoyment and loss of expectancy, Rs. 1,00,000/- as awarded by the High Court is maintained in the head of special diet. Thus, in the non-pecuniary heads, the compensation as determined comes to Rs. 5,00,000/-.

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 4648 of 2022.

Decided On: 06.07.2022

Abhimanyu Partap Singh Vs. Namita Sekhon and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

Indira Banerjee and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.

Author: J.K. Maheshwari, J.

Citation: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 793,MANU/SC/0821/2022.

Read full Judgment here: Click here.

Print Page

Supreme Court grants Future transportation rupees 2,50,000/- in motor accident claim case

Similarly, in the head of transportation in future, therefore, we enhance the said amount in lumpsum to Rs. 2,50,000/- in place of Rs. 1,00,000/- + Rs. 50,000/- as awarded by the High Court.

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Civil Appeal No. 4648 of 2022.

Decided On: 06.07.2022

Abhimanyu Partap Singh Vs. Namita Sekhon and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

Indira Banerjee and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.

Author: J.K. Maheshwari, J.

Citation: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 793,MANU/SC/0821/2022,

Print Page