We are unable to accept the contention of learned Counsel
Shri Talekar that a separate cadre can be created by the Government
Resolution. Reading the provisions of Sections 248 & 274, it would be clear
that matters regarding recruitment, etc. are to be regulated by rules to be
framed by the State Government in accordance with Section 274. No doubt,
that a power is given to the State Government under Sections 248 and 274
itself that in the matter of exigency, the Government may also regulate
conditions of service by a general or special order. However, it is a settled law
that a proviso cannot be permitted to govern substantive provision. When a
substantive provision mandates the Government to frame rules regarding
recruitment, etc., the proviso will have to be read in the manner that it
permits the Government to depart from the main provision if exceptional and
compelling case is made out.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3424 OF 1997
Santosh Ekoba Sonavane,
Versus
State of Maharashtra,
CORAM: B.R.GAVAI AND
S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ.
DATE : 2nd July, 2010.
Print Page
Shri Talekar that a separate cadre can be created by the Government
Resolution. Reading the provisions of Sections 248 & 274, it would be clear
that matters regarding recruitment, etc. are to be regulated by rules to be
framed by the State Government in accordance with Section 274. No doubt,
that a power is given to the State Government under Sections 248 and 274
itself that in the matter of exigency, the Government may also regulate
conditions of service by a general or special order. However, it is a settled law
that a proviso cannot be permitted to govern substantive provision. When a
substantive provision mandates the Government to frame rules regarding
recruitment, etc., the proviso will have to be read in the manner that it
permits the Government to depart from the main provision if exceptional and
compelling case is made out.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3424 OF 1997
Santosh Ekoba Sonavane,
Versus
State of Maharashtra,
CORAM: B.R.GAVAI AND
S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ.
DATE : 2nd July, 2010.