When Love is a Crime: 4 Surprising Truths from a Landmark Supreme Court Ruling in State of UP v. Anurudh.

 

1.0 Introduction: The Tangled Web of Teenage Love and the Law

In India, the line between teenage romance and the strict letter of the law can be perilously thin. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, a critical piece of legislation designed to shield children from predators, often finds itself at the center of complex cases involving adolescent relationships. This legislative reality was brought into sharp focus by the recent Supreme Court case, State of UP v. Anurudh.

Print Page

Supreme Court Urges Union To Bring 'Romeo-Juliet' Clause In POCSO Act To Shield Consensual Adolescent Relationships From Prosecution

A Necessitated Post-Script

 In Satish alias Chand v. State of U.P.10, the High Court, noted that on few occasions concern had been expressed by the Court with respect to application of the Act on consenting adolescence when it comes to consensual relationships between teenagers, four factors have been highlighted which, is crucial for the Courts to consider:

A. Assess the Context: Each case should be evaluated on its individual facts and circumstances. The nature of the relationship and the intentions of both parties should be carefully examined.

B. Consider Victim's Statement: The statement of the alleged victim should be given due consideration. If the relationship is consensual and based on mutual affection, this should be factored into decisions regarding bail and prosecution.

C. Avoid Perversity of Justice: Ignoring the consensual nature of a relationship can lead to unjust outcomes, such as wrongful imprisonment. The judicial system should aim to balance the protection of minors with the recognition of their autonomy in certain contexts. Here the age comes out to be an important factor.

D. Judicial Discretion: Courts should use their discretion wisely, ensuring that the application of POCSO does not inadvertently harm the very individuals it is meant to protect.

[See also: Mrigraj Gautam @ Rippu v. State of U.P.]   MANU/UP/3951/2023 : 2023: AHC : 204171

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 2026

Decided On: 09.01.2026

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Anurudh and Ors.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

Sanjay Karol and N. Kotiswar Singh, JJ.

Author: Sanjay Karol, J.

Citation:  MANU/SC/0045/2026.

Print Page