15. In this case, it is clear from the orders passed by the competent authorities, that the original declarant was holding excess land to the extent of 16000.32 square meters. When the orders passed by the competent authority and consequential notifications issued under Section 10(1) and 10(3) of the ULC Act have become final, it was not open for the respondent to file a suit seeking declaration, as prayed for. As we are of the view that jurisdiction of the civil courts is barred by necessary implication, trial court fell in error in entertaining the suit, as filed by the respondent and even the first appellate court and second appellate court have not considered the various grounds raised by the appellant in proper perspective.
Jurisdiction of civil courts to try suit relating to land which is subject matter of ceiling proceedings stands excluded by implication.
Supreme Court
JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
State of M.P. Vs. Ghisilal
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2153 OF 2012
22nd November 2021
Author: R.SUBHASH REDDY, J.
Citation: 2021 ALL SCR (ONLINE) 677
Print Page