Showing posts with label breach of provision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label breach of provision. Show all posts

Wednesday, 3 February 2016

Whether accused can take benefit of violation of provision of POCSO Act by police?

Section 24 of the POCSO Act runs as under :
"24. Recording of statement of a child.­
(1) The statement of the child shall be
recorded at the residence of the child or
at a place where he usually resides or at
the   place   of   his   choice   and   as   far   as
practicable by a woman police officer not
below the rank of sub­inspector.
(2) The   police   officer   while   recording
the statement of the child shall not be
in uniform”.

(3) The   police   officer   making   the
investigation, shall, while examining the
child,   ensure   that   at   no   point   of   time
the child come in the contact in any way
with the accused.
(4) No   child   shall   be   detained   in   the
police   station   in   the   night   for   any
reason.
(5) The police officer shall ensure that
the   identity   of   the   child   is   protected
from   the   public   media,   unless   otherwise
directed   by   the   Special   Court   in   the
interest of the child.”
 It   is   to   be   noted   that   said   provisions   are
made for benefit of the victim and not for benefit
of the accused. It would not lie in the mouth of
the   accused   that   the   breach   of   the   provisions,
ultimately, would vitiate the trial. It is provided
under the said provisions that the statement of the
victim child shall be recorded usually at her place
of   residence,   as   far   as   practicable   by   a   woman
police officer not below the rank of sub­inspector;
and   the   police   officer,   while   recording   the
statement, shall not be in uniform.

13] In fact, the investigating agency requires to
be   sensitive   in   such   matters.   The   object   and
purpose of the said provisions is to see that the
child,   who   has   already   been   victimized   by   the
perpetrator of the crime, should not be subjected
to recording of statement at the police station by
a male officer in uniform thereby again making her
uncomfortable and causing mental trauma.   In that
view of the matter, though the procedure prescribed
under Section 24 of POCSO Act, is not followed, it
can not be used to benefit the accused.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
  CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.261 OF 2014 
Damodhar s/o. Himtaji Dongre,

Versus
The State of Maharashtra,

­­
CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE  : AUGUST 12, 2015 
Citation; 2015 ALLMR(cri)4825
Print Page